The Face of the Other in Emmanuel Levinas and Alexey Uhktomsky

Journal Title: Studia Litterarum - Year 2017, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

The author compares ethical concepts of a Russian physiologist and philosopher Alexey A. Ukhtomsky and a French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. Both use the word “face” as a philosophical term. The paper examines the “face” as a key image in the work of both authors which helped them understand the meaning of dialogue and social interaction. The fact that the Russian word “litzo” (“face”) has two different meanings (a “person” and a “human face”) was very important for Ukhtomsky. For the better understanding of Levinas, it is necessary to take in account the interaction of Russian, Hebrew, and French languages as part of the linguistic consciousness of this author. Both philosophers considered ethics to be philosophia prima. The encounter with the face of the Other is the central event in the personality development for both Levinas and Ukhtomsky. For Levinas, the study of the face was a way to transcend the limits of phenomenology because the face is not a “common” phenomenon. For Ukhtomsky, the image of the face pointed at the problematic character of sciences. It was part of his search for the non-theoretical knowledge, e. g. knowledge that accounts not only for the universal but also for the individual and is capable of describing not only impersonal structures and objects but also individual and unique events. Both thinkers thus were seeking to reconsider religious tradition in the context of contemporary science and philosophy. Ukhtomsky arrives at the idea of asymmetrical relationship between the “I” and the “Other” independently of Levinas. Whereas Levinas describes the experience of the encounter with the Other as a kind of epiphany, Ukhtomsky calls God “the First and the Ultimate Interlocutor.” The encounter with the Other for both philosophers is, namely, a mundane, everyday analogue of the Revelation.

Authors and Affiliations

Alexey N. Belarev

Keywords

Related Articles

ON THE FRAGMENTARY PERCEPTION OF FRENCH LITERATURE IN THE 18TH CENTURY RUSSIA AND SWEDEN

The essay examines the problem of the fragmentary perception of European literature in the 18th Century Russia. The author compares the body of 17th Century French poetical works translated into Russian and Swedish la...

LITERARY PROCESS IN GERMANY AT THE TURN OF THE 19th and 20th CENTURIES: INTERACTION OF LITERARY TRENDS

The article discusses dynamic interaction among artistic communities (trends, movements, etc.) exploring the specificity of literary space in Germany at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. This is a comparative st...

AUCTORITAS: AUTEUR ET AUTORITÉ CHEZ DIDEROT ( À PROPOS DE QUELQUES ÉPIGRAPHES )

Diderot approaches the notions of work and author in a wide variety of ways. His works are “works” only because they “work” in the sense that they transform from within the categories of author and reader, blurring the b...

CHAPTERS FROM PUSHKIN’S NOVEL. CULTIC MECHANISMS AND TEXTUAL POETICS OF “THE LAST TEXT” AND THE SWORD OF “THE SENSITIVE NOBLEMAN” BY ANDREY BITOV

This study aims to trace and demonstrate the construction of Pushkin cult in two essays by Andrey Bitov, “The Last Text” and “The Sword of the Sensitive Nobleman.” It examines how cultic mechanisms including specific r...

BLOK’S ROSE AND CROSS IN THE LIGHT OF ROSICRUCIAN TRADITIONS

The author explores the mystical nature of symbols and the leitmotif structure of Alexander Blok’s drama Rose and Cross. The choice of the 13th Century Languedoc as the basis for the drama’s chronotope shows that the p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP26183
  • DOI 10.22455/2500-4247-2017-2-4-30-43
  • Views 277
  • Downloads 16

How To Cite

Alexey N. Belarev (2017). The Face of the Other in Emmanuel Levinas and Alexey Uhktomsky. Studia Litterarum, 2(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-26183