A comparative study of esmolol versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of cardiovascular response following laryngoscopy

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2017, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of esmolol versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy. Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Place and duration of study: Rajah Muthiah Medical College, Chidambaram, 2017-2018.Methodology:After acceptance from the department of ethical committee and written informed consent from all patients, a single blinded RCT was conducted on 50 patients (n=50) aged 20–45 years (both sex) of ASA I-II who are posted for elective surgery. They were chosen randomly and allocated into 2 different groups, group A and group B with 25 members in each group. All patients were premedicated with inj.Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg IM 45 min before induction. Group A received inj. Esmolol 1.5 mg / kgand Group B received Dexmedetomidine 1µg / kg iv. After induction with inj.Thiopentone 5mg/kg and inj. Succinyl choline 2mg/kg, laryngoscopy and ET intubation was done. N2O: O2 mixture- 65:35 and 2% sevoflurane were used as maintenance anaesthesia during intraoperative period.Haemodynamic variables like HR, SBP, DBP and MAP were recorded for both groups before induction, immediately post Intubation, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min and 30 min post intubation. Data was analysed and compared. Results: Dexmedetomidine 1µg / kg given intravenously ten minutes preceding induction, obtunded the pressor response post laryngoscopy andETintubation to a statistically significant level compared to Esmolol. Conclusion: Debilitation of pressor response is noted with both Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol. Among the twodrugs Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kgi.v bolus provides consistent and more effective debilitation than Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg i.v bolus.

Authors and Affiliations

R Gowthaman, M Shanmugavalli

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of different doses of Injection Cisatracurium to establish optimal dose for reduction of propofol injection pain

Background and Aims: The aim is to compare different doses of injection Cisatracurium given prior to injection propofol intravenous (IV) with venous occlusion by applying tourniquet for thirty seconds; and to establish t...

Ultrasound guided tap block: Comparison of analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine

Study objective: Ultrasound guided transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective method of providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. We compared the postoperative analgesic ef...

A prospective randomised comparative study of efficacy of combination of inj. exmedetomidine–propofol and inj.fentanyl-propofol for the insertion conditions of proseal laryngeal mask airway

Background: Dexmedetomidine over a period of time has been studied with Propofol as a co-induction agent to assess the haemodynamic response, Propofol dose requirement and overall insertion condition of laryngeal mask ai...

Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation: Comparison of clonidine, esmolol, lignocaine and placebo

Background: The laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation produce sympathoadrenal responses that alter in systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac rhythm. It leads to little consequences in healthy individ...

Comparison of effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine use in subarachnoid block

Background: The primary aim of intrathecal local anaesthetic is to provide adequate sensory and motor block necessary for all below umbilical surgeries. A number of adjuvants, such as clonidine, midazolam and others have...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP440549
  • DOI 10.26611/1015818
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R Gowthaman, M Shanmugavalli (2017). A comparative study of esmolol versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of cardiovascular response following laryngoscopy. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 8(1), 38-43. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-440549