A study of effectiveness of Intravenous Lidocaine and Gabapentin and their combination on postoperative analgesia for thyroid surgeries at tertiary health care center

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: An ultimate goal of surgical treatment is approaching better recovery for a high quality of life without complications and sequelaes. More than 80% of surgical patients experience postoperative pain. Aims and Objectives: To Study Effectiveness of Intravenous Lidocaine and Gabapentin and Their Combination on Postoperative Analgesia for Thyroid Surgeries at tertiary health care center. Methodology: After approval from the institutional ethical committee this cross-sectional study was carried out in the department of anesthesiology during the two year period February 2013 to February 2014 in the patients undergoing thyroid surgeries. After written consent the patients were randomly enrolled into three different treatment group for the alleviation of post-operative pain i.e. L-Group- Lidocaine, G-Group- Gabapentin group, LG-Combination of both the groups. The post -operative pain was assed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18,24 hrs. by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) it was tabulated as Mean ± SD analyzed by ANOVA test calculated by SPSS-19 version software. Result: The majority of the patients were in the age group of 40-50 i.e. 33.33%, followed by 50-60, 26.67%, 30-40-20.00%, 20-30-13.33%, >60 were 6.67%. The majority of the patients were Female i.e. 53.33% and Males were 46.67%. The severity of the pain as assessed by VAS score was significantly more in the L-Group and G-Group as compared to LG -Group at 0 (P<0.05), 2 (P<0.05), 4 (P<0.05), 6 (P<0.01), 12(P<0.01), 18 (P<0.001),24 (P<0.05) hrs. of post-operative time. Conclusion: The combination of Lidocaine and Gabapentin was found to be superior to individual each drug with respect to less VAS score at various durations of post-operative period.

Authors and Affiliations

K Vijay Kumar, N Sadanandam

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative study on ease of insertion and haemodynamic changes in I-gel versus laryngeal mask airway classic in patients under general anaesthesia

Background: Airway management is one of the most important skills in the field of anaesthesiology. The major responsibility of an anaesthesiologist is to provide adequate ventilation to a patient. The most vital element...

A comparative study of the efficacy of I.V. esmolol and megnesium sulphate in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Problem Statement: The tracheal intubation is a powerful noxious stimulus. During laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation these is cardiovascular stress response. It occurs frequently and results in increased serum concentr...

Study of spinal anaesthesia in paediatric age group in rural set-up

Background: The commonly adopted method of anaesthesia in children is general anaesthesia (GA) as per the traditional standards. But, in rural set up, where there is lack of finance, high tech monitoring equipment, man p...

Anaesthesia for a patient with Co-arctation of aorta undergoing cesarean section

Pregnancy and its associated challenges in cardiovascular physiology present a unique challenge in a woman with an underlying heart disease. In this case a 23 year old primi-granida, 38 weeks of gestational age, with coa...

Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka

Background: Propofol and Etomidate is commonly used in anaesthesia practice. However pain on injection and myoclonus are the most common side effects of this drug. Objectives: To compare the side effects between Etomidat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP261009
  • DOI -
  • Views 144
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

K Vijay Kumar, N Sadanandam (2017). A study of effectiveness of Intravenous Lidocaine and Gabapentin and their combination on postoperative analgesia for thyroid surgeries at tertiary health care center. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 4(2), 42-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-261009