Agreement Between the Stages Cycling and SRM Powermeter Systems during Field- Based Off-Road Climbing

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between two portable cycling powermeters for use doing field based mountain biking. A single participant performed 15 timed ascents of an off-road climbs. The participants bicycle was instrumented with Stages Cycling and SRM powermeters. Mean and peak power output and cadence were recorded at 1 s intervals by both systems. Significant differences were determined using paired t-tests, whilst agreement was determined using 95% ratio limits of agreement (LoA). Significant differences were found between the two systems for mean power output (p<.001), with the Stages powermeter under reporting power by 8 % compared to the SRM. LoA for mean power output were 0.92 ×÷ 1.02 (95% LoA = 0.90 – 0.93). Peak power output was also significantly lower with the Stages powermeter (p=.02) by 5 % when compared to the SRM powermeter. LoA for peak power output were 0.94 ×÷ 1.09 (95% limits of agreement = 0.87 – 1.03). Significant differences were found for mean cadence between the two powermeters (p=.009), with LoA being 0.99 ×÷ 1.01 (95% limits of agreement = 0.99 – 1.00). This study found that though the Stages Cycling powermeter provided a reliable means of recording power output and cadence, the system significantly underestimated mean and peak power output when compared with the SRM system. This may in part be due to differences in strain gauge configuration and the subsequent algorithms used in the calculation of power output and the potential influence of bilateral imbalances within the muscles may have on these calculations.

Authors and Affiliations

Howard T Hurst| Division of Sport, Exercise and Nutritional Science, University of Central Lancashire, UK. United Kingdom., Stephen Atkins| Division of Sport, Exercise and Nutritional Science, University of Central Lancashire, UK. United Kingdom., Jonathan Sinclair| Division of Sport, Exercise and Nutritional Science, University of Central Lancashire, UK. United Kingdom., John Metcalfe| Division of Sport, Exercise and Nutritional Science, University of Central Lancashire, UK. United Kingdom.

Keywords

Related Articles

Effects of seat height on muscular pattern and interlimb coordination in cycling

The riding position is a key factor for performance in cycling particularly to prevent chronic diseases related to practice. Even though some authors use the crotch length to get the ideal seat height, others base the r...

Treadmill cycling trial in diagnostics endurance preparation of MTB cyclists before Olympic Games or World Championship

The evaluation of endurance preparation of MTB cyclists in conditions corresponding to the specificity of routes of World Championship (WCh) and Olympic Games (OG) is very difficult. Treadmill cycling trials are used in...

Quantification of vibrations during mountain biking

Background: During cross-country mountain biking, riders are subjected to vibrations due to the terrain, which must be damped before reaching the central nervous system. Damping vibrations requires work, which may help...

Influence of pacing on reliability of middledistance cycling performance

The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability of middle distance cycling time trials using fast-, even-, and slow-starts. Eighteen endurance-trained male cyclists [mean ± standard deviation; VO2peak 63....

Spanish cycling and attitudes towards doping of different stakeholders involved

The aim of this study was to know and compare the attitudes towards doping among different groups involved in Spanish cycling: future physical trainers, elite cyclists, young cyclists, and cycling team managers. The samp...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2903
  • DOI -
  • Views 361
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Howard T Hurst, Stephen Atkins, Jonathan Sinclair, John Metcalfe (2015). Agreement Between the Stages Cycling and SRM Powermeter Systems during Field- Based Off-Road Climbing. Journal of Science and Cycling, 4(1), 21-27. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2903