Antitrust Liability in the Context of Online Platforms. Case Comment to the Preliminary Ruling of the Court of Justice of 21 January 2016 ‘Eturas’ UAB v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (Case C-74/14)

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 14

Abstract

In its judgment of 21 January 2016 in Case C-74/14 (hereinafter, judgment), the Court of Justice (hereinafter, CJ) responded to a preliminary question submitted by the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. The latter asked whether the mere dispatch of an email relating to the maximum level of rebates may constitute sufficient evidence to establish that its addressees can be found liable for illegal concerted practices within the meaning of Article 101(1) TFEU. The CJ judgment raises novel issues specific to antitrust enforcement in e-commerce in two areas: (i) can users of a third party online booking platform be found liable for an anti-competitive practice purely on the basis of receiving unprompted email messages, even if they were not aware of their content, and (ii) what steps should they take in order to distance themselves from anti-competitive actions in an e-commerce environment

Authors and Affiliations

Bartosz Targański

Keywords

Related Articles

Problems Related to Determining of a Single Economic Entity under Competition Law

The article explores the problems related to the determination of a single economic unit under competition law. The first part of the article addresses the concept of a single economic entity. It is presumed that compani...

Protection of Consumers’ Rights in Railway in the Slovak Republic

The paper focuses on railway services in the Slovak Republic and describes the organization of public administration in this area and its responsibility for protecting consumer rights. It analyses customers’ rights stipu...

Dragan Gajin, Tijana Kojovic Competition Law in Serbia,Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, 2017, 168 p. (book review)

Dragan Gajin, Tijana Kojovic Competition Law in Serbia,Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, 2017, 168 p. - In May 2017, Wolters Kluwer published the first monograph on Serbian competition law written in English. The...

Private Enforcement and Opt-out System Risks, Rewards and Legal Safeguards

The EU Antitrust Damages Actions Directive does not include provisions for collective redress. Each EU member state is free to provide national regulation on this matter. The Portuguese legal system provided regulation o...

4th Polish-Portuguese PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law. Białystok, 10 June 2016 (conference report)

The 4th Polish-Portuguese PhD Students’ Conference took place on 10 July 2016 in Białystok, Poland. The conference focused primarily on competition law issues in Portugal and Poland. It was organized b...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP324447
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.15
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bartosz Targański (2016). Antitrust Liability in the Context of Online Platforms. Case Comment to the Preliminary Ruling of the Court of Justice of 21 January 2016 ‘Eturas’ UAB v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (Case C-74/14). Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 9(14), 293-298. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-324447