Comparative Study of Transabdominal Ultrasonography and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Carcinoma

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours in the digestive tract and is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The incidence in India is 7-8 cases per 100,000 persons per year and it is the most common cancer in males in Chennai. The aim of the present study was to compare Ultrasonography (USG) and MDCT findings in the detection and staging of gastric carcinoma by correlating with histopathology. Material and methods: Data were collected from 30 cases of clinically suspected/proven cases of gastric carcinoma that were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for Ultrasonography and MDCT. Ultrasound examination was performed using a real time ultrasound with curvilinear transducer of 2-5 MHz and linear transducer of 7-10 MHz with ingestion of boiled cooled water. Plain and contrast MDCT study was performed in all the cases. The comparative study of ultrasonography and MDCT in diagnosing and staging of gastric carcinoma were analysed. Results: The accuracy in detection of gastric carcinoma by USG was 80% (24/30 cases) and MDCT was 87% (26/30 cases), with p value of < 0.01 which is significant, which shows CT is better modality for diagnosing gastric carcinoma. For T staging, the efficacy of MDCT and USG was 90% (27/30 cases) and 80% (24/30 cases) respectively. For nodal status, the accuracy of CT is 73.3 %(22/30 cases) and USG is 63.3 %(19/30 cases). For distant metastasis, accuracy was same with USG and CT (70%, 27/30 cases). But when both the modalities are combined, the efficacy improves for diagnosing and staging gastric carcinoma by 93% with P<0.05. The anastomosis degree of the gastric carcinoma between enhanced CT and ultrasonography was κ=0.404 Conclusion: Overall USG and Multi–detector row CT with combined water and air distention can improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Comprehensive imaging of US and MDCT is helpful to improve the accuracy of detection and staging of gastric carcinoma.

Authors and Affiliations

Sagar M. P, Indira Narayanaswamy, Ramprakash H. V

Keywords

Related Articles

Parent Child Relationship and Self Esteem among School Going Adolescents

Introduction: Adolescence can be described as the transition between childhood and adulthood. The parent child relationship consists of a combination of the behaviour, feelings and expectations in a parent child relation...

A Study on Comparitive Role of Ultrasonogram and Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disease of the pancreas characterized by auto digestion of pancreatic parenchyma, resulting from the inappropriate intracellular activity of proteolytic pancreati...

Detection of Coronary Artery Anomalies using 64 Slice MDCT Angiography

Introduction: Coronary artery anomalies are uncommon conditions of congenital origin with an incidence ranging from 0.17% in autopsy cases to 1.2% in cases undergoing conventional angiography. Coronary artery anomalies w...

A Hospital-based Observational Study on the Characterization and Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns with Clinical Findings on Cerebral Palsy

Introduction: Evidence suggests that the diagnosis of cerebral palsy complemented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has potential to differentiate changes in the various types of cerebral palsy, especially the patholog...

Role of Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Accidents

Role of Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Accidents

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472514
  • DOI 10.21276/ijcmsr.2018.3.4.27
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sagar M. P, Indira Narayanaswamy, Ramprakash H. V (2018). Comparative Study of Transabdominal Ultrasonography and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Carcinoma. ​International Journal of Contemporary Medicine surgery and Radiology, 3(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-472514