Comparing the effectiveness and safety of sub-tenon’s anaesthesia and peribulbar anaesthesia in anterior segment surgery

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Proper anaesthetic management is an integral part of any successful eye surgery. Patient comfort during the operative procedure is the single most important factor. The search for surgical adjutants to achieve anaesthesia and akinesia has produced many advances, easing the ordeal of surgery for both the patient and the surgeon. Methods: 500 patients undergoing anterior segment surgery after obtaining consent were included in the study. Out of which, 250 were administered peribulbar while 250 were given sub-Tenon‟s anaesthesia randomly. Pain during administration of anaesthesia, during surgery and 4 h after surgery was graded on a visual analogue pain scale and compared for both the techniques. Sub-conjuntival haemorrhage, chemosis, akinesia after administration of anaesthesia and positive pressure during surgery were also compared. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: The sub-Tenon's anaesthesia procedure was painless for 25.2% of the patients; The peribulbar anaesthesia procedure was painless for 8.91% of the patients. The anaesthetic block was very efficient with both the techniques. Pain during anaesthetic administration was lower for sub-Tenon‟s anaesthesia (63, 25.2%). Chemosis, sub conjunctival haemorrhage was more common with sub-Tenon‟s anaesthesia. Akinesia was better with peribulbar anaesthesia Conclusion: The volume of anaesthetic injected is more with peribulbar anaesthesia when compared to sub-Tenon‟s anaesthesia. Pain during anaesthetic administration is lower with sub-Tenon‟s anaesthesia compared with the peribulbar technique. Chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage are more frequent with sub-Tenons anaesthesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Sumeet , Deshpande, Sunita S Deshpande, Rajashree Reddy, Vishwanath Reddy

Keywords

Related Articles

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in various indications and its comparison with penetrating keratoplasty

Diseases affecting the cornea are a major cause of blindness all over the world, second only to cataract in overall importance. The prevalence of corneal diseases varies from country to country and even from one populati...

Visual outcome following cataract surgery in patients with traumatic cataract in a tertiary hospital, South India

Aim: To analyze the intraoperative complications and postoperative outcome during cataract extraction in traumatic cataract. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the traumatic cataracts presenting at M.S. Ramaiah Med...

To study the management of primary pterygium by surgical excision with conjunctival autograft with limbal stem cells in a tertiary care hospital in hilly area of North India

Aim The aim is to study the management of primary pterygium by surgical excision with sutureless conjunctival autograft with limbal stem cellsMaterials and Methods Patients with advanced pterygium were recruited from eye...

Risk factors of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) a study at tertiary care centre

Introduction Retinal vein occlusion is second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy BRVO caused due to occlusion of branch vein of retina with involvement of particular quadrant On ophthalmosco...

Sodium bicarbonate versus hyaloronidase in peribulbar anaesthesia

The goals of safe effective anaesthesia is to achieve good surface anaesthesia akinesia hypotony analgesia Peribulbar anesthesia is a safer to minimize complications of retrobulbar anesthesia Hyaluronidase is used to aid...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241281
  • DOI -
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sumeet, Deshpande, Sunita S Deshpande, Rajashree Reddy, Vishwanath Reddy (2016). Comparing the effectiveness and safety of sub-tenon’s anaesthesia and peribulbar anaesthesia in anterior segment surgery. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2(3), 201-206. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-241281