Judicial Review and Pardoning Power of President: An Analysis

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

In common parlance, to pardon means to forgive a person of his offence. The term ‘pardon’ has been defined as an act of grace, proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the law, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed upon, from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It affects both the punishment prescribed for the offence and the guilt of the offender. In other words, grant of pardon wipes off the guilt of accused and brings him to the original position of innocence as if he had never committed the offence for which he was charged. Under Indian law, the President of India and the Governors of States have been given the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence. In law, pardon is an exemption from punishment for a criminal conviction granted by the grace of the executive of the government. A general pardon, to a class of persons guilty of the same offence, is an amnesty. A pardon terminates criminal liability, including any restriction that results from a criminal conviction though the person is not exonerated from the civil liability that a crime may have incurred. A pardon is thus to be distinguished from alleviation of punishment, such as commutation of sentence, reprieve and parole which does not nullify the conviction and all effects. Justice Holmes of US Supreme Court has said that pardon as of today is not an act of grace but is a constitutional scheme which when granted is determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed. Montesquieu believed in significance of clemency in the monarchical system.

Authors and Affiliations

Aparna Singh

Keywords

Related Articles

Women and Politics in India: A Perspective

A detestable political countenance that has been concealed behind the ugly political manoeuvrings for long is women’s negligible representation in Indian politics. Whenever invoked about the matter, almost all political...

Challenges of Cartels: A Business Perspective

Competitors are expected to compete with each others; competition creates efficiency, encourages innovation, improves quality, reduces costs and prices, gives choice to consumers at lower prices and so on and so forth. I...

Incompetence of Police in Maintaining Law and Order: A Critical View Point

The police in developed countries face relatively few incidents of organized public defiance, and therefore the exercise of police discretion in handling major law and order problems has not been a focus of study. In con...

Legal Recognition of Live-In Relationship and Its Challenges to the Institution of Marriage

The concept of marriage and live-in relationship are two distinct ideas evolved out of human relations. The marriage promises factor of permanency in the relationship between man and woman whereas there is no guaranty of...

The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) of WTO and Its Impact on India

The international trade treaties especially the treaties and agreements under World Trade Organization (WTO) have challenged the very existence and livelihood of the farmers throughout the world especially in developing...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP453223
  • DOI 10.21088/ijlhb.2454.7107.3217.4
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aparna Singh (2017). Judicial Review and Pardoning Power of President: An Analysis. Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior, 3(2), 93-101. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-453223