Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 7

Abstract

Third-party punishment has recently received attention as an explanation for human altruism. Feelings of anger in response to norm violations are assumed to motivate third-party sanctions, yet there is only sparse and indirect support for this idea. We investigated the impact of both anger and guilt feelings on third-party sanctions. In two studies both emotions were independently manipulated. Results show that anger and guilt independently constitute sufficient but not necessary causes of punishment. Low levels of punishment are observed only when neither emotion is elicited. We discuss the implications of these findings for the functions of altruistic sanctions.

Authors and Affiliations

Rob M. A. Nelissen and Marcel Zeelenberg

Keywords

Related Articles

Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect

Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and impro...

How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans

This study measures the perceived costs, perceived benefits, choice outcome satisfaction, and choice process satisfaction from consumers making hypothetical choices amongst prescription drug plans. I juxtapose the number...

Methodological notes on model comparisons and strategy classification: A falsificationist proposition

Taking a falsificationist perspective, the present paper identifies two major shortcomings of existing approaches to comparative model evaluations in general and strategy classifications in particular. These are (1) fail...

The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations

An insurance policy may not only affect the consequences for victims but also for perpetrators. In six experiments we find that people recommend milder punishments for perpetrators when the victim was insured, although p...

The glow of grime: Why cleaning an old object can wash away its value

For connoisseurs of antiques and antiquities, cleaning old objects can reduce their value. In five experiments (total N = 1,019), we show that lay people also often judge that old objects are worth less when cleaned, and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677711
  • DOI -
  • Views 151
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rob M. A. Nelissen and Marcel Zeelenberg (2009). Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677711