Multimodality of the category EMOTIONS in art discourse: a fractal semiotics perspective

Abstract

<p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This article focuses on revealing the ontological peculiarities of the multimodal nature of the verbally represented category EMOTIONS in the ecology of art discourse. On the grounds of philosophy of emotion, psychology of art, cognitive theories of emotion and B.&nbsp;Mandelbrot’s theory of fractals to complement the linguocognitive, cognitive-discursive and semiotics approaches, we elaborate an integrative evidence framework of the fractality of the category EMOTIONS in the circumflex of its conceptual components JOY, SADNESS, INTEREST, SURPRISE, ANGER, FEAR, DISGUST as natural fractals, actualized in modern art discourse in matrices of their conceptual features EXPERIENCE STIMULUS, APPRAISAL, EMERGENCE TIME, DIRECTION. A special emphasis has been laid on both the essence of art discourse, implying discourses on art and art as discourse, being an environment of conceptualizing and verbalizing aesthetic emotions, and on the role of the cognitive mechanisms of metaphors and metonymies in multimodal objectivizations of the category EMOTIONS fractals in discourses of visual arts and music (installations and tone painting). The relation between emotion, cognition, semiotics, art and language has been specified. As a result of the analysis based on the core multimodal research concepts of modes, semiotic resource, modal affordance and intersemiotic relations we have found out that verbalized category EMOTIONS conceptual ingredients are anchored in art perception, acquiring their fractal representation in clusters of modalities. The latter comprise the alethic, deontic, axiological, temporal, spatial, epistemic ones, getting recursively realized verbally, visually, aurally, linked with synesthesia, including chromesthesia, ideasthesia, spatial sequence, triggered by conceptualized and verbalized feeling experience response. With this work we demonstrate the value of fractal semiotics approach as a heuristic device to study multimodal categories.</span></span></p>

Authors and Affiliations

Юлія Шамаєва

Keywords

Related Articles

Linguodidactic Ideas of Yakym Yarema

<p>The article for the first time investigates the linguodidactic aspects of the activity and scientific achievements of Ukrainian scientist Yakym Yakymovych Yarema (1884–1964). In order to achieve the goal, his scientif...

Utterance as the Unit of Analysing Selfpresentation Strategy in the Englishlanguage Discourse

<p>The article provides insights into characteristic features of utterances-self-presentemes and the ways of their identification in the English-language dialogical discourse. The understanding of self-presentation as a...

Lexical Saturation of a Contemporary Intellectual AD in the English and Russian Languages: a Comparative Study

<p lang="ru-RU" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', monospace;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-si...

Specific Features of Literature Discourse and its Aspects

<p>The article provides insights into the nature of literature discourse and its cognitive and communicative aspects. This type of discourse is viewed as cognitive-communicative interaction between the author and the rea...

Communication levels in lyrical and poetic discourse

<p>The article presents a concept of poetic text analysis from the perspective of speech act theory which distinguishes not two (as recognized in communicative pragmatic studies), but three levels of communication in lyr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP458249
  • DOI -
  • Views 134
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Юлія Шамаєва (2018). Multimodality of the category EMOTIONS in art discourse: a fractal semiotics perspective. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна: Серія «Іноземна філологія. Методика викладання іноземних мов», 88(), 49-58. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-458249