Sprzeciw sumienia w orzecznictwie ETPC (na podstawie wyroku Wielkiej Izby z 7 lipca 2011 r. w sprawie Bayatyan v. Armenia)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2016, Vol 134, Issue 3
Abstract
The article provides an analysis of judgment of Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 July 2011 in the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, in which the Court, based on the “living instrument” doctrine, gives — inter alia — a new creative interpretation of Article 9 of the Convention. In this interpretation the Court broadened its scope of protection to include conscientious objectors, to autonomous extent, within the full meaning of this prerequisite not functionally limited to matters relating to the armed service, which might be indicated by the scope of the case considered.
Authors and Affiliations
Jacek Falski
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP218222
- DOI -
- Views 66
- Downloads 0
Wolność nauki i nauczania oraz autonomia uczelni a jakość naukowa uniwersytetów
The purpose of this article is to confi rm that the length of freedom of science and teaching legal warranty period, as well as the autonomy of the universities in a country, have contributed to the highlevel research. I...
W sprawie rządowych projektów ustaw: Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (druk nr 2446), przepisy prowadzające ustawę — Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (druk nr 2447) (opinia pierwsza)
The opinion refers to the bills: Law on higher education and science and Introductory provisions to the Law on higher education and science. The author critically analyzes the bills, focusing mostly on the first one. Leg...
Interpretacja konstytucji: warianty teorii i praktyki na przykładzie Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku
The author examines the complex issue of interpretation of the constitution, based on the assumption that only the interference of the content of the constitution in practice creates a constitution. As Michel Troper poin...
Australia: wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z 27 października 2017 r. w sprawie Re Canavan i inni, sygn. (2017) HCA 45
In its judgment, the High Court of Australia interpreted Article 44 of the Constitution, stating that “Any person who is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject...
Kształtowanie formy rządów w Konstytucji kwietniowej z 1935 r.
The adoption of the April Constitution (1935) manifested Poland’s departure from the existing constitutional regulation and a response to the malfunctioning of its parliamentary system established in 1921 by the March Co...