Terms and procedural form of establishment or changes of method and order of execution of administrative court decision

Abstract

Issues of establishment and change of methods of legal defence and order of execution of administrative court decisions are considered in the article. The doctrine definitions of method and order of execution of court decision, and also their designation, have been analysed in judicial practice. Terms and particularities of the procedural form of resolution of the mentioned questions, reasonable suggestion on the improvement of their legislative adjusting have been proposed also. It is noted that establishment or change of methods and order of execution is applicable only to the court decisions; this procedure is not applicable therefore to the decisions of other authorities (public servants) that is subject to execution. The great majority of cases with the issues of establishment or change of method and order of execution of decision deal with social payments (in particular, their re-calculation). In such cases, as a rule, there is a question about the penalty of facilities instead of an obligation to produce the re calculation of the charged extra sums. The procedural form of decision of these issues was clarified; the content of corresponding statements is specified. This procedure is possible within the circumstances that considerably impede or doing impossible execution of court decision. Change or establishment of method and order of execution is possible only if it is unconnected with the change of method of judicial defence, and in absence of necessity of evolving of new persons and establishment of new circumstances. The reasonable advisability of the debtor’s provision of the right to hand in a corresponding application is substantiated. The reasonable advisability of consideration of the given application with the executant’s engagement having a corresponding executive document in the procedure is substantiated. Terms of consideration of issue or change of method and order of execution of administrative court decision are considered.

Authors and Affiliations

О. О. Кошкош

Keywords

Related Articles

The mechanisms of counteraction to information threats of external sources

The effectiveness of the mechanism for ensuring national security is determined primarily by its ability to contribute to the preservation of the unity of nations, the stability of public relations, the protection of nat...

Internet piracy as a rational choice: evidence from the Becker model and J. S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions

According to expert estimation, 33% of informal sector of Ukrainian economy is shaped by piracy. Special 301 reports on copyright protection argue that Ukraine has serious problems with legal regulation of copyright prot...

Principles of indirect taxation

The purpose of the article is to analyze the existing theoretical approaches to the definition of the system of principles of tax legislation, as well as to isolate and analyze the legal principles of indirect taxation....

The need for alternative professional knowledge to study and evaluation of legal relationships by administrative judges.

The features of law enforcement in administrative courts are examined in the article. The author proves that special, including technical, knowledge is needed when dealing with cases in these specialized courts. From the...

Obstacles to the application of the guilty presumption principle in Ukraine as a means of combating political corruption in the context of the threat to national security

The article analyses the principle of “presumption of guilt” as a means of combating the phenomenon of corruption in general, and with the phenomenon of political corruption in particular, on the examples of the applicat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445667
  • DOI -
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. О. Кошкош (2017). Terms and procedural form of establishment or changes of method and order of execution of administrative court decision. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 83-88. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445667