The Will to Believe: An Evaluation of William James’s Pragmatic Defence of Faith

Journal Title: Dini Araştırmalar -Altı Aylık Bilimsel Dergi- - Year 2016, Vol 19, Issue 48

Abstract

Although it has been generally considered that evidential arguments are the only appropriate way to believe that God exists, it has been argued that there are also nonevidential arguments/reasons for belief in God. William James’s “The Will to Believe” is one of the most signifi cant non-evidential reasons in favour of religious belief. James criticises Clifford’s views and asserts that we have the right to believe even if the evidence is inconclusive. According to Clifford, it is wrong to believe any proposition on insuffi cient evidence. James’s primary goal is to show that Cliffordian evidentialism is irrational because it prevents us from acknowledging certain kinds of truth. And James argues that our passional/non-epistemic nature can determine what we believe when an option is a genuine option which means live, forced, and momentous options and cannot be decided on intellectual/epistemic grounds. The argument briefly enables us to say that “Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by its nature be decided on intellectual grounds”. In this essay, I will discuss James’s “The Will to Believe” and some objections which have been directed to it. First, I will argue that our passional nature is not a reliable guide to truth and that many confl icting religious beliefs can be justifi ed on this ground. And second, I will argue that although James accuses Clifford’s evidentialism of preventing us from acknowledging certain kinds of truth, his argument is equally vulnerable to a similar objection.

Authors and Affiliations

Abdulkadir TANIŞ

Keywords

Related Articles

An Unobtrusive but Important Personage: Shams al-din Muhammad al-Iskandari al-Mizzi

Shams al-din al-Iskandari, life and works of him has not been deal with in Islamic, especially in today’s Tasawwuf researches yet, is a sufi scholar who tried to be competent of all sciences known in his age and geograph...

Crime, Social Deviance and Religion: Religious Affiliation Levels of Female Prisoners

The number of women involved in crime than men, always less. While studies on prison usually based on men. Although very few studies on women, female prisoners are almost no studies on the understanding of religion. This...

The Association of Surahs to Certain Time Periods and Events

Efforts to understand the Quran has continued uninterrupted since its revelation period and the interpretation activity has been carried out using certain methods until today. There are three different approaches to the...

Perfection and the Ontological Proof

Ontolojik kanıt, Tanrı’nın mahiyetinden/tanımından var olduğu sonucuna varılabileceği şeklinde bir akıl yürütmeye dayanır. Bu makalede, böyle bir akıl yürütmeyi temel alarak Tanrı’nın mahiyeti ile varlığı arasındaki iliş...

The Cosmological Argument

The Cosmological Argument which is based on the explanation of the universe known as cosmos is the theistic argument. The starting point of Plato’s and Aristotle’s arguments is to inquire the origin of the movement in th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP229257
  • DOI 10.15745/da.93324
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Abdulkadir TANIŞ (2016). The Will to Believe: An Evaluation of William James’s Pragmatic Defence of Faith. Dini Araştırmalar -Altı Aylık Bilimsel Dergi-, 19(48), 179-202. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-229257