UNDERSTANDING CONATIVE REGULATION SYSTEMS – AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OFFENDERS AND NON-OFFENDERS

Journal Title: Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation - Year 2016, Vol 17, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous studies confirmed personality traits as being important predictors of criminal behavior. The aim of this research was to determine which constellation of basic personality traits incarcerated individuals and those serving alternative sanctions differ, and which traits make the difference between the criminal and the non-criminal populations. In this research, the model of personality used is a cybernetic model of conative functioning, which assumes that conative regulation systems almost completely describe the structure of personality. Methods: The study sample consisted of 391 male respondents (152 offenders serving prison sentence, 91 convicts sentenced to alternative penalties and 148 non-offenders). Examined variables were: the regulator of activity (Extroversion), the regulator of organic functions (Hysteria), the regulator of defense reactions (Anxiety), the regulator of attack reactions (Aggressiveness), the system for coordination of regulatory functions (Psychoticism) and the system for integration of regulatory functions (Integration). Results: There were significant differences in all dimensions of personality between groups, except for the framework of Extraversion. The traits that contribute to the difference between individuals serving prison sentence and offenders sentenced to alternative penalties are Integration and Aggressiveness. The traits that contribute to the difference between non-offenders and offenders serving prison sentence are Psychoticism, Integration, Aggressiveness, and Anxiety. Among offenders sentenced to alternative penalties and the general population no difference in personality traits was found. Conclusion: Our findings may indicate the need for mandatory diagnostic psychological evaluation of persons who have committed minor offenses, to ensure the right decision is made when choosing between prison and an alternative method of punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Sanja DJURDJEVIC| Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, Zilijeta KRIVOKAPIC| 2High Medical School of Professional Studies, Сuprija, Serbia, Rosa SHAPIС| University of Bjeljina, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sreten VICENTIC| Clinic of Psychiatry, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Keywords

Related Articles

THE STRUCTURE OF MOBILITY AND SKILLS AMONG DEAF CHILDREN

A research of mobility and skills among deaf children (from 7 to 17 years old) is presented in this work. The sample of examinees (N=98) is consisted of two subsamples. The first subsample is consisted of deaf children (...

MULTIDIMETIONAL OUTCOME AND LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF NON-AVOIDANCE THERAPY

International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF, WHO, 2001) is a constructive framework for quality assessment and treatment in Logopedics (Speech Language Therapy). The current research study ma...

BENEFICIAL YEARS OF SERVICE FOR DEFECTOLOGISTS IN INSTUTIONS FOR TREATMENT OF DEEP MENTALLY RETARDED PEOPLE

Povod za realizirawe na ovoj proekt, koj mnogu godini nanazad e dosta aktuelen, e najden vo Zakonot za rabotni odnosi na Republika Makedonija donesen vo 1993 i vo negovite izmeni od 1994, 1995 i 1997 godina. Vo ~len 32 o...

THE RIGHTS OF THE HANDICAPPED PERSONS IN CASE OF THE LOW FOR SOCIAL CARE

Pravnata regulativa e edna od osnovnite pretpostavki za organizirawe i vospostavuvawe na sistem na socijalna za{tita i rehabilitacija na lica so pre~ki vo psihofizi~kiot razvoj. So ogled na specifi~nosta na potrebite na...

AGRAMMATISM AS A ISOLATION FORM OF THE ACQUIRED LANGUAGE DISORDER

A 52-year-old right-handed women with suddenly disorder of verbal communication, accompained by depression and impairment of memory has been presented. The results of language function examination have shown agrammatism,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP7985
  • DOI -
  • Views 432
  • Downloads 35

How To Cite

Sanja DJURDJEVIC, Zilijeta KRIVOKAPIC, Rosa SHAPIС, Sreten VICENTIC (2016). UNDERSTANDING CONATIVE REGULATION SYSTEMS – AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OFFENDERS AND NON-OFFENDERS. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 66-84. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-7985