A Comparative Analysis of Sorry for and Sorry about in Two Corpora

Journal Title: International Journal of Social Science And Human Research - Year 2021, Vol 4, Issue 12

Abstract

The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide a comparative analysis of Sorry for and Sorry about in the COCA and BNC. When it comes to the COCA, it is interesting to point out that the types Sorry for and Sorry about show the same pattern in the TV/movie and fiction genres and the academic genre, whereas they show a different pattern in the blog, web, magazine, newspaper genres and the spoken genre. With respect to the BNC, it is significant to note that Sorry for and Sorry about show the same pattern in the fiction genre and the spoken genre, whereas they show a different pattern in the newspaper and magazine genres and the misc, non-academic and academic genres. It can thus be inferred that these two types are synonymously used, but they are slightly different from each other in their use. A major point to note that in the COCA, Sorry for is the furthest type from Sorry about in the TV/movie genre, whereas Sorry for is the nearest type to Sorry about in the academic genre. A further point to note is that in the BNC, Sorry for is the furthest type from Sorry about in the spoken genre, whereas Sorry for is the nearest type to Sorry about in the academic genre. The COCA clearly shows that Sorry for people is the most preferable one for Americans, followed by Sorry for Mr., Sorry for me, and Sorry for Mrs., in that order. The COCA shows, on the other hand, that Sorry about dinner is the most preferable one for Americans, followed by Sorry about lunch, Sorry about Mr., Sorry about agent, and Sorry about that, in descending order. The COCA clearly indicates that the expression Sorry for being is the most preferable one among Americans, followed by Sorry for interrupting, Sorry for having, Sorry for getting, and Sorry for making, in descending order. The COCA also shows that the expression Sorry about being is the most preferable one for Americans, followed by Sorry about getting, Sorry about calling, and Sorry about leaving (Sorry about having), in that order. It is worth noting that only two nouns (Mr. and things) can be the collocations of both Sorry about and Sorry for. It is also worth pointing out that eleven of thirteen seven gerunds are linked to both Sorry about and Sorry for. This in turn suggests that Sorry about and Sorry for are interchangeably used, but they are somewhat different from each other in their use.

Authors and Affiliations

Namkil Kang

Keywords

Related Articles

Teaching Decimal Operations to Develop Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning Competency for Primary School Students in Vietnam

Vietnam is in the process of comprehensively reforming education. In 2018, the Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training issued the General Education Program. In addition to general competencies, the 2018 General Edu...

Implementation of the Polluters Pays Principle in The Case Of PT. Kumai Sentosa

The Polluters Pays Principle is the obligation of environmental polluters to bear the costs of environmental losses and the costs of environmental restoration in the amounts specified in statutory regulations. This princ...

School Leadership Support in Advancing Action Research Activities among Administrators and Teachers in Belaga District, Sarawak

This study aims to identify the level of school leadership support in promoting a culture of action research among administrators and teachers in the Belaga District. Based on a sample of 242 respondents, findings indica...

Ho Chi Minh Thoughts on Love for People during the Revolution Period (1939-1945) and the Meaning of the Time

Ho Chi Minh's ideology on human love is one of the throughout contents of his ideological heritage. This is also considered a core content in Ho Chi Minh's humanistic thought. In particular, during the revolutionary peri...

Factor Affecting the Application of Sem Marketing at Small and Medium Enterprises in Hanoi

In the context of the volatile market economy, especially the increasing of competition, Marketing is considered as an indispensable tool in production and business activities, along with the strong development of techno...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP704217
  • DOI 10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-01
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Namkil Kang (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Sorry for and Sorry about in Two Corpora. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 4(12), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-704217