A Comparative Analysis of the Collective Dominance Definition in Ukrainian and European Law – the Electricity Market Case
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 14
Abstract
This paper follows acomparative approach to the analysis of collective dominance doctrine and practice in the EU and the enforcement practice in Ukraine. The aim of this paper is to assess the compliance of the Ukrainian competition authority’s (AMCU) analysis of the national electricity market with EU law enforcement practice. The latter arises from Ukraine’s wider duty to fulfil its international law obligation to comply with EU competition rules, based on Article 18 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community also taking into account the interpretative criteria developed in EU case law (according to Article 94 of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU). Article 255 of the Association Agreement, which clearly provides for the use of the principle of transparency, non-discrimination and neutrality when complying with the procedures of fairness, justice and the right of defence, also illustrates the necessity of carrying out research in this field. The paper examines notions such as: the dominance doctrine, market power definition, economic strength and collective dominance in the EU enforcement practice. Special attention is placed on enforcement practice in the electricity market. Since the scrutinised market inquiry constitutes the first investigation into the Ukrainian electricity market, there is no national practice on this issue yet. For this reason, the analysis follows awide comparative approach towards the principles of collective dominance in the electricity market in Ukraine. The paper concludes that the AMCU’s approach to the regulation of the electricity market in Ukraine confirms the necessity to reform the system of state regulation in the wholesale electricity market and in the market of services for electricity transmission. In order to develop competition in the electricity market, it is also necessary to change the system for tariff and pricing policy formation on the part of the National Energy and Utilities Regulatory Commission of Ukraine and the Ministry of Energy and Coal-Mining Industry of Ukraine. Stressed is also the necessity to follow the approach and criteria of EU competition law with regard to the determination of market dominance. This requirement is stipulated by Ukraine’s international legal obligations arising from Articles 18 and 94 of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and Article 255 of the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine.
Authors and Affiliations
Kseniia Smyrnova
The Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement Of Competition Law Before and After the EU Directive – a Hungarian Perspective
The paper explores the changes the EU Directive on harmonizing certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions will bring about in Hungary, with aspecial...
Grounds for Private Enforcement of Albanian Competition Law
Infringements of competition law can cause serious harm to both consumers and undertakings. Aside from the development of public enforcement of competition law, much focus has been placed in recent...
Effectiveness of Judicial Review in the Polish Competition Law System and the Place for Judicial Deference
The article discusses the effectiveness and the intensity of judicial review in the Polish competition law system. First, it studies whether the judicial review offered by the 1st instance Court of Co...
Third National Conference: Consumer in the Rail Passenger Market. Łódź, 25 May 2016
The Third National Conference entitled “Consumer in the rail passenger market” was held on 25th May 2016 at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Łódź. The event was organised for the third time by t...
Contracts and Automation: Exploring the Normativity Of Automation in the Context of U.S. Contract Law and E.U.Consumer Protection Directives
Given a choice between two systems of contract rules, acourt or legislature may have a normative obligation to adopt the rule that is more susceptible to coding and automation. This paper explores the ramifications of th...