A comparative evaluation of apical microleakage of MTA fillapex and AH26 sealers in the presence ofblood in the canal space of the teeth

Journal Title: Caspian Journal of Dental Research - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Apical seal in blood or dry root canal is a problem in endodontic treatment. Failure of apical seal causes inflammatory reaction and failure root canal treatment. Because of the sealer properties, root canal should be dry for obturation. But hydrophilic sealers can adhere to root canal walls nowadays and this problem is still controversial. This study aimed at determining the apical microleakage of AH26 and MTA Fillapex sealers in dry and bloody condition. Methods: This experimental in vitro study was done on 48 extracted central teeth. The researchers used the Mtwo rotary files for root canal instrumentation. In this process, the teeth were divided into four groups (2 dry groups and 2 bloody groups) and two groups as positive and negative control (each group of 4 teeth). All sealers were prepared according to the factory instruction and the obturation was done with gutta-percha and sealer. After 7 days in 100% moisture condition, the teeth were placed in the ink for 3 days and then were cut across longitudinal axis and the level of microleakage was measured by stereomicroscope. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS software, ANOVA, Chi-Square and t-test statistical tests. Results: The mean of MTA Fillapex and AH26 apical microleakage in blood groups were (448.61±34.67) Mm and (429.84±31.63) Mm respectively. The minimum microleakage belonged to AH26 sealer, but it was not significant. Conclusion: AH26 sealer is a better barrier against microleakage in comparison with MTA Fillapx, although it is not significant. Also, the evidence suggests drying the canal leads to a better apical seal and the blood significantly increases apical microleakage.

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Soleymani, Sina Mirzairad, Abbas Mesgarani, Azadeh Harandi, Soraya Khafri, Farideh Feizi, Mahyar Bahmannia

Keywords

Related Articles

Knowledge and practices concerning the effects of ionizing radiation and x-ray protection methods in dental offices in Babol, 2013

Introduction: As the absorption of radiation in environment is increasing, the present study was performed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of Babol’s dentists about x-ray protection. Materials &Methods: This cros...

Effect of triple Antibiotic paste and 2% chlorhexidine gel on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin; an in vitro study

Effect of triple Antibiotic paste and 2% chlorhexidine gel on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin; an in vitro study

Quantity and quality of solid wastes produced in dental offices of babol city

Introduction: Dental wastes due to having bacterial disease-causing agents and toxic chemicals are categorized in hazardous wastes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantity and composition of dental waste produ...

A comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography in the diagnosis of sheep mandibular bone defect: an in vitro study

Introduction: Diagnosis of lesions and bone defects is very important and there is a lack of substantial studies on the most appropriate method for bone defect measurement. Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate the...

Clinical and denture-related characteristics in patients with epulis fissuratum: a retrospective 58 case series

Introduction: Epulis fissuratum is one of the important denture-related mucosal lesions that occurs around the borders of an ill-fitting denture. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cases of epulis fissuratum ad...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP178964
  • DOI -
  • Views 83
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ali Soleymani, Sina Mirzairad, Abbas Mesgarani, Azadeh Harandi, Soraya Khafri, Farideh Feizi, Mahyar Bahmannia (2014). A comparative evaluation of apical microleakage of MTA fillapex and AH26 sealers in the presence ofblood in the canal space of the teeth. Caspian Journal of Dental Research, 3(1), 35-40. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-178964