A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF KETAMINE-PROPOFOL VERSUS FENTANYL-PROPOFOL IN TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHESIA- A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 54

Abstract

BACKGROUND Propofol has emerged as a gold-standard for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for short surgical interventions but lack of analgesia remains its main shortcoming, therefore it is always combined with an analgesic. Ketamine and fentanyl are the popular analgesic in this context. This study was carried out to compare these drugs with propofol to assess haemodynamic and recovery profile of either combination. Objective- To evaluate quality and compare haemodynamic variability of anaesthesia among the patients scheduled for short surgical procedures in ketamine-propofol and fentanyl-propofol groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, hundred consenting patients undergoing short elective surgeries were divided into two groups of fifty each. Group PF received propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 2 μg/kg for induction and propofol 4 mg/kg/hr. + fentanyl 1 μg/kg/hr. for maintenance of anaesthesia and group PK received propofol 2 mg/kg + ketamine 1 mg/kg for induction and propofol 4 mg/kg/hr. + ketamine 1 mg/kg/hr. for maintenance of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic variables were recorded pre, intra and postoperatively at regular intervals. At the end of drug infusion(s), time to spontaneous eye opening and response to postoperative questionnaire was noted to assess recovery. All the data presented as mean + standard deviation. RESULTS Patients in both groups did not differ significantly in demographic profile and haemodynamic parameters. Time to spontaneous eye opening was similarly comparable in both the groups (8 ± 3 min. and 8 ± 2 min.) (p = 0.53). Response to postoperative questionnaire at 30 minutes after anaesthesia was good in both the groups. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was also statistically insignificant between both the groups. (p = 0.74). CONCLUSION Ketamine and fentanyl with propofol infusion for short surgical procedures are equally safe and efficacious. In both groups stable haemodynamics and good recovery profile were noted.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandhya Pandey, Suman Gupta, Bhanu Choudhary, Vibha J Sakhare

Keywords

Related Articles

BODY MASS INDEX AND HEEL PAIN- A HOSPITAL-BASED STUDY

BACKGROUND Heel pain is one of the fastest growing problems in the community. Overweight or obesity is suggested as a key factor associated with heel pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study consisti...

  ROLE OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE IN ACUTE ORGANOPHOSPHORUS POISONING: A HOSPITAL BASED CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

  [b]BACKGROUND[/b]: Pesticide poisoning is a public health problem in developing countries. The anticholinesterase effect of OP compound is observed by decrease in serum pseudo cholinesterase level. The present stu...

A STUDY OF PALLOR IN ELDERLY- HAEMATOLOGICAL PROFILE

BACKGROUND Anaemia in the elderly (age > 65 years) is defined as a haemoglobin concentration below 12 gm/dL and 13 gm/dL in women and men respectively. This decrease in oxygen carrying capacity can lead to overall declin...

A STUDY OF CLINICAL PROFILE OF DENGUE FEVER IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND Dengue fever is the most common arbovirus disease in urban and semi-urban areas of tropical country. Over the past three decades, there is dramatic increase in number leading to unprecedented panic amongst the...

PERI-OPERATIVE SYNTOCINON INFUSION IN LSCS

BACKGROUND Oxytocin for the purposes of augmentation and induction of labour is one of the most frequently used medications in obstetrics. Recent studies show that oxytocin is used in over 50% of labouring women in some...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP225805
  • DOI 10.14260/Jemds/2017/884
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandhya Pandey, Suman Gupta, Bhanu Choudhary, Vibha J Sakhare (2017). A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF KETAMINE-PROPOFOL VERSUS FENTANYL-PROPOFOL IN TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHESIA- A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 6(54), 4094-4097. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-225805