A Comparative Prospective Study of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl for Labor Analgesia

Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Pain relief during maternal labor is one of the main goals of maternity care. Combined spinal epidural analgesia is an accepted technique to alleviate labor pain with minimal side-effects to mother and fetus. Aims: To evaluate the effect of combination of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on maternal and neonatal outcomes during labor in comparison to dexmedetomidine or fentanyl alone. Materials and Methods: We carried out a prospective study on 120 consecutive parturients over a period of 1-year from June 2017 to December 2017 at a tertiary care hospital. Patients were randomly divided to three groups of 40 each: Group D (n=40): Patients received 5 μg intrathecal dexmedetomidine in 1 ml of normal saline; Group F (n=40): Patients received IT 20 μg fentanyl in 1 ml of normal saline and Group DF (n=40): Patients received IT 5 μg dexmedetomidine plus 10 μg fentanyl in 1 ml of normal saline. Maternal heart rate and non invasive blood pressure were recorded every 5 minutes following the intrathecal injection. Other side effects such as pruritus, nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression were recorded. Results: Demographic findings were comparable in all the groups. Onset of analgesia was faster and duration of analgesia was longer in group DF than in the two other groups. There was no statistical difference between the three groups as regard the mode of delivery. Regarding to maternal side-effects; hypotension and bradycardia were recorded in group D (6 patients (15%), 5 patients (12.5%) respectively) more than the two other groups; the fentanyl group showed significant increase in pruritus 10 patients (25%); lastly nausea and vomiting were detected only in DF group one patient (2.5%). Conclusion: Addition of 5 μg intrathecal dexmedetomidine to 10 μg fentanyl prolonged the duration of analgesia. The combination decreases the incidence of side effects in comparison to IT 10 μg dexmedetomidine or IT 20 μg fentanyl alone.

Authors and Affiliations

Eeshwar Rao Madishetti, Syed Ali Aasim

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Evaluation of Racemic Salbutamol and Levosalbutamol in Asthmatics

Background: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease. The present study was conducted to compare racemic Salbutamol and Levosalbutamol in patients with asthma. Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted on 180 p...

A Clinical Study on Fronto Nasal Flap for Nasal Tip Reconstruction: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Reconstruction of any part of face and oral cavity is always very challenging to any concerned specialty and it should involve a team of specialists from different specialties to overcome the problems faced while doing a...

DENSITY OF ENDODONTIC OBTURATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL AND MECHANICAL LATERAL CONDENSATION TECHNIQUES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background: It is generally accepted that long-term endodontic success is dependent upon the ability to seal the peri-apical tissues from communication with the canal system. The present study was planned for comparison...

Analysis of Deaths due to Snake Bites- A Forensic Study

Background: Human snake encounters with negative results such as animal death, habitat destruction, injuries to people, injuries to wildlife and the like are common. The present study was conducted to assess the cases of...

Survey on Different Types of Hypertensive Disorders and its Complications among Pregnant Women

Background: To determine the frequency and distribution of different types of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Materials and Methods: The retrospective descriptive survey design was adopted for this study in order to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP500791
  • DOI -
  • Views 130
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eeshwar Rao Madishetti, Syed Ali Aasim (2018). A Comparative Prospective Study of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl for Labor Analgesia. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 6(1), 93-97. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-500791