A Comparative Research on the Principles of ‘Alā al-yad and Al-kharāj and the Genealogy of their Narrational Chain of Transmission

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2017, Vol 49, Issue 108

Abstract

The evidence of legal rules is sometimes a tradition with different impression, sometimes it is of Sh‘īa origin, sometimes of Sunnī origin, and sometimes sharing both Shī‘a and Sunnī. With a brief explanation of the principles of ‘alā al-yad (owning an object by having it at one’s disposal), kharāj (tribute), “assessment of significance”, and the “genealogy” of the hadith, ‘alā al-yad mā akhadhat ḥattā tu’addiya (It is incumbent upon man to give back what is at one’s disposal) and kharāj bi al-ḍāmān (tribute by surety) from the two major sects (Sunnī and Shī‘a), the present article explores into and researches about the origin of these two hadiths. The renowned majority of the Sunnī and Shī‘a jurists consider the principle of ‘alā al-yad applicable to sound contract, the benefits of mustawfāt (secondary benefits) and non-mustaqfāt of corrupt contract, and misappropriation; and do not consider the principle of kharāj applicable corrupt contract and misappropriation. Ibn Ḥamza from among the Shī‘as and Abū Ḥanīfa and Abū Yūsuf from among the Sunnīs consider kharāj as included in corrupt contract and misappropriation. The writer presumes surety (ḍamān) in the two principles as homonyms and the relation between the two as divergent and, like the Shī‘a jurists, finds the hadith “It is incumbent upon man to give back what is at one’s disposal” and “tribute by surety” to be of Sunnī origin. Furthermore, by providing the time these two hadiths entered the Shī‘a sources and the motivation for relying on them, he (the writer) considers as inefficient the most outstanding narrative reasons for the principles ‘alā al-yad and kharāj for the Shī‘a jurists and just to be presumed as confirming other reasons.

Authors and Affiliations

Hadi Mesbah, Husayn Saberi

Keywords

Related Articles

A Deliberation on Article 873 of Civil Law (Generalization of the Inheritance of the Drowned and those Buried under Debris to other Ambiguous Deaths)

The condition for the legatees inheriting from their legators, as asserted in the first part of article 875 of civil law, is that the legatee is to be alive when the legator dies. Therefore, for someone to inherit from a...

Types of Application of Analogy in Shī‘a Jurisprudence According to Jawāhir al-Kalām

Analogy and how to treat it is among the earliest issues in the jurisprudence and principles of legal schools. Meanwhile, although in Shī‘ism the universal approach in this respect has since long ago been a negative one...

Criterion for “Anti-Shī‘a Approach”, Rulings and Effects Governed over the Anti-Shī‘as in Imāmī Jurisprudence

There are five views concerning the criterion for the anti-Shī‘a (nāṣibī) in the jurisprudential literature of the Imāmī jurists. These views include 1. Prioritizing non-Ali to Ali (A.S.); 2. Showing enmity toward follow...

A Research on the Criterion for Investigation about the Justice of the Anonymous

One of the most important legal issues debated among the jurists is whether it is necessary or unnecessary to investigate the justice of the anonymous and to what extent. The renowned majority of the jurists maintain tha...

Examining the Principles of Legitimacy of the Nullifying Condition in Shī‘a Jurisprudence

A little deliberation on the contents of the contracts concluded between the real and legal persons reveals that nowadays the nullifying condition is gradually being included as one of the conditions of contracts. The le...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP191169
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.27063
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hadi Mesbah, Husayn Saberi (2017). A Comparative Research on the Principles of ‘Alā al-yad and Al-kharāj and the Genealogy of their Narrational Chain of Transmission. فقه و اصول, 49(108), 111-130. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-191169