A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN HERNIOPLASTY WITH AND WITHOUT DRAIN AND THE ASSOCIATED COMPLICATIONS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 22

Abstract

BACKGROUND The present study is a comparative study to compare in Lichtenstein’s mesh repair, the need of a subcutaneous suction drain in inguinal hernias at Government General Hospital, Guntur. To study the advantages and disadvantages of using subcutaneous suction drain in Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the present study, out of 50 patients,32% of patients who had undergone drainage group complained of pain and 8% of patients who had undergone non-drainage complained of pain. In our study, 0% and 4% of patients developed haematoma in drainage and non-drainage group, respectively. 12% of patients in drainage group developed seroma and 12% of patients in non-drainage group developed seroma. In the present study, 16% of cases in drainage and 20% in non-drainage group. In the present study, patients in drainage group mean postoperative hospital stay is 9.1 days and in non-drainage group is 6.7 days. The average duration of postoperative hospital stay in patients of drainage group is higher than in non-drainage group with the above results, the early postoperative complications like pain, mean postoperative stay in hospital are increased in Lichtenstein’s with drainage group. The early postoperative complications like seroma, haematoma and wound infection rates are similar in both drainage and non-drainage groups. So, it appears that suction drain usage can be restricted in Lichtenstein’s tension free mesh repair in simple inguinal hernias unless the hernia is complicated or there is extensive dissection. RESULTS The details of all the (50) cases were drawn as master chart with regard of relevance. Statistical analysis was done using Epi info version 3.5.3. P value is calculated using Chi-square test. CONCLUSION In the present study, 50 patients with inguinal hernia who had undergone Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty with subcutaneous suction drain are compared with those who had undergone Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty without drain.

Authors and Affiliations

Amruthavalli Bayya Venkatesulu, Mudavtu Bhagavan Naik

Keywords

Related Articles

INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR MANAGEMENT OF SYMPATHETIC OPHTHALMIA – CASE REPORT

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE A 50-year-old male presented to us with the chief complaints of progressive diminution of vision in the left eye since the past one year. He had a past history of open globe injury to his right e...

MANAGEMENT OF A GIANT TYPE IV A CHOLEDOCHAL CYST: CASE REPORT

Choledochal cysts are uncommon congenital anomalies of the biliary tree defined as abnormal, disproportionate, cystic dilatations of the biliary duct. (1) We report a 20 month old female child who presented with obstruct...

INCIDENCE OF HYPOCALCAEMIA AFTER SUTURELESS TOTAL THYROIDECTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL TOTAL THYROIDECTOMY- A COMPARATIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND Symptomatic and asymptomatic hypocalcaemia can occur in a significant proportion of patients who undergo thyroidectomy surgery. This study aims to determine the incidence of postoperative hypocalcaemia after s...

IMPACT OF VITAMIN D ON PREGNANCY AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME

Vitamin D is required throughout life. It is necessary for the formation of bone, but also likely plays an important role in several other physiological systems and it prevents several degenerative diseases and anticance...

ROLE OF MRI IN COMMON POSTERIOR FOSSA TUMORS

MR imaging plays an increasingly important role in evaluation of patients suspected of harbouring disease in the posterior fossa because of its superior virtually artefact free display of anatomy and pathology in this re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP215246
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/247
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Amruthavalli Bayya Venkatesulu, Mudavtu Bhagavan Naik (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN HERNIOPLASTY WITH AND WITHOUT DRAIN AND THE ASSOCIATED COMPLICATIONS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(22), 1266-1271. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-215246