A comparative study of Appendicectomy: open and laparoscopic

Journal Title: Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic method for the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis is now-a-days becoming popular. The main advantage of the Laparoscopic abdominal surgery is related to the avoidance of Laparotomy wound. Materials and methods: The total number of patients admitted by various surgical units during this study period was 580, out of which 126 case of appenicitis were admitted and operated in department of general surgery. 60 patients underwent appendicectomy by the conventional Open method and the remaining 66 patients underwent surgery by Laparoscopic method. Results: In total of 580 surgical cases admitted out of which 126 cases were operated for appendicitis, has incidence of 21.7%, number of days of parenteral usage of antibiotics to be more in the Open appendicectomy group. Oral feeds were resumed on an average in about one day in Laparoscopic surgery, while it took about 1 ½ days in open surgery. Duration of hospital stay was one day more in Open surgery group than in Laparoscopic surgery group. This difference was statistically significant. All the patients who underwent Laparoscopic surgery were able to return to normal activity, on an average, 5 days earlier than patients who underwent Open surgery. (P=0.001). There was a significant difference (P=0.02) in the wound infection rate which was around 8 % in the Open group while none in the Laparoscopic group. 89% of the patients undergoing Laparoscopic appendicectomy felt that they had an excellent cosmetic end result while only 2% of Open group felt the same. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy was better than Open appendicectomy with regard to pain, wound infection, co-existing pathology, duration of hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, excellent cosmetic end result, lesser use of antibiotics, and earlier resumption of oral cosmetic end result,feeds. It indicates that Laparoscopic appendicectomy has better results and will become the standard of care.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Oruganti Shankar

Keywords

Related Articles

Isolation, identification and characterisation of bacteria from ripe tomatoes grown under different agronomic conditions

Background: Tomatoes are exposed to potential microbial contamination. The objective of the study was to determine the presence of bacteria in and on tomato fruits grown under different agronomic conditions in Lusaka. Me...

Chronotherapeutic drug delivery systems

Chronobiology is the study of biological rhythms. A lot of diseases have been found that have shown rhythm in their symptoms and severity. For the treatment of such diseases, the timing of drug administration has to be m...

Evaluation of work stress in health care receptionists: A cross sectional study

Back ground: Receptionists’ work is complex, demanding and intense, involving a high level of commitment to patients, colleagues, and the practice. Aims and objectives: This study was aimed at an evaluation of stress le...

Pain beliefs and affecting factors of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with hematological cancer

Aim: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the pain beliefs and affecting factors of the cancer patients subjected to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods: The sample of the study was 94 hematolog...

Management of mandibular first premolar with vertucci type III root canal configuration

Mandibular premolars exhibit a complex and variable root canal morphology and the identification of these variations requires thorough knowledge of root canal morphology and proper interpretation of radiographs for succe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP523685
  • DOI 10.21276/apjhs.2016.3.1.28
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Oruganti Shankar (2016). A comparative study of Appendicectomy: open and laparoscopic. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 3(1), 168-174. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-523685