A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL REACTION TIMES IN TYPE II DIABETIC AND NON-DIABETIC INDIVIDUALS

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 42

Abstract

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus over a period produces autonomic dysfunction. It is usually associated with poor prognosis. Reaction time is a simple noninvasive test for peripheral as well as central nervous system. Neurological deficit in patients with diabetes mellitus can be diagnosed by measurement of reaction time before it is clinically evident. Few studies have been done on the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on reaction time. Thus, this study was undertaken to determine the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on auditory and visual reaction time. MATERIALS AND METHODS 25 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 25 healthy, age-matched control group were enrolled based on detailed questionnaire and informed consent was taken from all the subjects. The mean age of type 2 diabetic subjects was 48.8 years and that of control was 48 years. The subjects with type 2 diabetes were on oral medication and of more than 5 years duration. Subjects with history of alcoholism, smoking, history of hypertension, subjects on insulin, complicated cases of diabetes, subjects with visual and auditory disturbances, history of any recent illness, history of peripheral neuropathy, history of muscle weakness, severe anaemia, history of psychological disorders & neurovascular complications are excluded from the study. PC1000Hz reaction timer was used to measure auditory and visual reaction time. RESULTS Auditory and visual reaction times of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were significantly higher as compared to those of nondiabetic control group. The p value for visual reaction time was 0.001 and that for auditory reaction time was 0.003. CONCLUSION Reaction time measurement can be used for early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus before it is clinically manifested. Hence it can be considered as a simple non-invasive method for the early diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors and Affiliations

Pramila T. , Sindhu R. , Vinay A. V, Vastrad B. C

Keywords

Related Articles

TO STUDY EFFECT OF GABAPENTIN ON ATTENUATION OF PRESSOR RESPONSE TO DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION AND ON PERIOPERATIVE PAIN

BACKGROUND Endotracheal intubation was first described by Rowbotham and Magill in 1921.1 In 1940 Reid and Brace first described hemodynamic response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation due to Noxious stimuli.2 The circulatory...

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF POST OP ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN USING RECTAL DICLOFENAC SUPPOSITORY, CAUDAL BLOCK WITH BUPIVACAINE AND A COMBINATION OF BOTH

BACKGROUND Management of postoperative pain in neonates and children is a challenging job for anaesthesiologist since pain is responded by infants with an autonomic response. Multimodal analgesia has been invariably used...

A RARE CASE REPORT OF EMPHYSEMATOUS CYSTITIS IN A DIABETIC PATIENT

: Emphysematous cystitis is a rare disease caused by gas fermenting bacterial and fungal pathogens. Clinical symptoms are non-specific and diagnostic clues often arise from the unanticipated imaging findings. The clinica...

INTRACRANIAL AND INTRASPINAL TUMOURS: REVIEW OF MRI FINDINGS IN A RARE NF-2 CASE

Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, characterized by multiple intracranial and intraspinal tumours associated with ocular abnormalities. The most common tumor associated with the disease is th...

CERVICAL EPIDURAL ANAESTHESIA FOR PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE PLATING SURGERY IN A PATIENT WITH CKD GRADE 5- A CASE REPORT

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 52-year-old male presented to the Orthopaedics OPD with history of fall on an outstretched arm. He complained of pain, swelling and deformity of left arm.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP576097
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2018/599
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pramila T. , Sindhu R. , Vinay A. V, Vastrad B. C (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL REACTION TIMES IN TYPE II DIABETIC AND NON-DIABETIC INDIVIDUALS. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 5(42), 2929-2931. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-576097