A Comparative Study of Caudal Analgesia with Bupivacaine Alone and Bupivacaine with Butorphanol in Pediatric Surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The assessment of pain in small children is often difficult to interpret as the most common sign of pain is crying which is also seen in a myriad of non pain full conditions. Epidural space in children favours rapid longitudinal spread of drugs and makes it effective in treating postoperative pain. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of caudal bupivacaine alone or in combination with butorphanol for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: A Simple Randamoized which includes 50 patients posted for urogenital operations such as herniotomy, orchidopexy, urethroplasty and CTEV Correction divided into two groups of 25 each. Group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine and Group BB received 0.25% Bupivacaine with Butorphanol adjuvant. The effect of recovery from caudal blockade and duration of analgesia was compared and contrasted. Results: There were no significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation between two groups. Postoperative pain score was comparable in two groups in first eight hours, but it is significantly less in bupivacaine with butorphanol group which is statistically significant. There is a significant difference between the groups in the mean duration of analgesia with Group BB having a much longer duration compared to Group B. 3 patient in Group B and 5 patient in Group BB had nausea in postoperative period, which is statistically insignificant (p>0.05). No episodes of any other clinically significant postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: Butorphanol is considered to be a safe and effective adjuvant to Bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in children undergoing surgery below umbilicus.

Authors and Affiliations

Shaik Salman

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparitive Study of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Bupivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia

Labour is an extremely painful process. Labour pain is of major concern since most parturients experience significant pain of extremely severe intensity. Labour pain can have deleterious effects on the mother, on the foe...

A Comparative Study of Right and Left IJV Cannulation Using Surface Anatomy or USG Guidance: A Prospective Randomized Study

Context: Internal jugular vein (IJV) is cannulated in a variety of patients. Left IJV cannulation sometimes becomes necessary. Aim: This study was done to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasonography (USG) in performing le...

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Haemodynamic Response to Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: As laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a routinely performed surgery, it is desirable to have a stable intraoperative haemodynamic status. This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of single intravenous bol...

Assessment of Sensory and Motor Blockade by Bupivacaine with Dexmeditomedine or Fentanyl as Adjuvant in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

Introduction: In the present-day practice of Anaesthesiology Bupivacaine is the most commonly used drug for subarachnoid block. Many adjuvants have been tried to improve the quality of analgesia and to prolong the durati...

A Comparative Study of Hyperbaric Ropivacaine (0.5% in Glucose 5%) with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5% in Glucose 8%) for Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is well established technique in which several local anaesthetic drugs are used. These drugs have their own advantages and disadvantages regarding safety profile, onset and duration of acti...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP667865
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.30
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shaik Salman (2019). A Comparative Study of Caudal Analgesia with Bupivacaine Alone and Bupivacaine with Butorphanol in Pediatric Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(4), 1275-1281. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-667865