A comparative study of early versus delayed emergency open appendectomy

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical and Health Research - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: The controversy still exists about the timing of operation for appendicitis. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between early appendectomy and delayed appendectomy and assess the feasibility of delayed operation. Methods: The medical records of patients with acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures were white blood cell (WBC) count at postoperative first day, time to soft diet, complication rate, surgical site infection (SSI) rate, length of hospital stay, and readmission within 30 days. Results: During the study period, a total of 478 patients underwent appendectomies, and 145 patients were excluded, leaving 333 who met inclusion criteria. Based on the time from arrival at hospital to incision, they were divided into two groups: 177 (53.2%) in group A and 156 (46.8%) in group B. There were no significant differences in preoperative demographics and clinical data between two groups. The mean WBC count at postoperative first day of group B were lower than that of group A (p = 0.0039). There were no significant differences in time to soft diet, length of postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, and readmission rate between two groups. SSI including intra-abdominal abscess was also shown no significant difference (Group A, 1.7% and Group B, 3.9%; p = 0.3143). Conclusions: This study revealed that delayed appendectomy was safe and feasible for adult patient although the clinical outcomes of delayed appendectomy were not superior to those of early appendectomy. We suggest that surgeons would decide the appropriate timing of appendectomy with consideration other situations such as available hospital resources.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Nasim Akhtar, Dr. Athar Nomani, Dr. Bushra Salim, Dr. Sarfaraz Jalil Baig

Keywords

Related Articles

Clinical profile of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A cross sectional study

Background: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive disease that has a highly variable clinical course. IPF constitutes a subgroup of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases with distinct clinical, radiolo...

A cross-sectional study on quality of life among acne vulgaris patients in an urban population of Rajasthan, India

Objectives: Acne vulgaris is a chronic disease pilosebaceous units of skin affecting the face in adolescents and adults It has considerable psycho-social impact on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). The aim of our s...

Clinical and nutritional parameters in patients of chronic pancreatitis (CP) with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and the effect of routine treatment of SIBO in these patients

Background: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is significantly associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP). No study has evaluated the clinical and nutritional outcome of patients after successful treatment of S...

Combined spinal epidural anesthesia advantages and limitations: An overview

The combined spinal–epidural technique (CSE) has attained widespread popularity for patients undergoing major surgery below the umbilical level who require prolonged and effective postoperative analgesia. Among the favor...

A unique case of accessory brachial artery and its continuation as accessory ulnar artery: A case report

A sound knowledge of vascular anatomy of upper limb is of paramount importance, since this is a site of frequent injury and of various surgical and invasive procedures. The term Accessory brachial artery was first establ...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP582098
  • DOI -
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Nasim Akhtar, Dr. Athar Nomani, Dr. Bushra Salim, Dr. Sarfaraz Jalil Baig (2017). A comparative study of early versus delayed emergency open appendectomy. International Journal of Medical and Health Research, 3(1), 106-110. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-582098