A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF LOCAL INSULIN VERSUS TOPICAL PHENYTOIN IN DIABETIC FOOT ULCER

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 51

Abstract

BACKGROUND Diabetic foot ulcer is the common complication and it affects almost 15% of all diabetic patients. Majority of the ulcer can heal. Healing is better in neuropathic ulcer than neuroischaemic ulcer. In India, diabetic foot ulcer is common cause of nontraumatic amputation of limbs, which is preventable. MATERIALS AND METHODS It is an open labelled randomised prospective study conducted at Department of General Surgery, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, Amalapuram. Total 90 patients divided randomly into three groups include this study as per exclusion and inclusion criteria. Group A were diabetic foot ulcer belongs to topical insulin dressing group. Group B belongs to topical phenytoin group and group C belongs to conventional wound care group. RESULTS In group A, size of the wound reduced from mean value 6.8 cm2 to 1.4 cm2 ; percentage change in the size of the wound was 79.4%. In group B, the size of the wound reduced from 5.9 cm2 to 2.4 cm2 ; percentage reduction in the size of the wound was 59.3%. In group C, the mean size of the wound was reduced from 7.1 cm2 to 4.2 cm2 ; percentage reduction was 40.8%. The depth of the wound also reduced in the entire three groups. Mean reduction in the depth of the wound in group A was 9 mm to 2 mm that is 77.7%. In group B, the percentage mean reduction was 69.0%, and in group C, it was 51.2%. CONCLUSION In present study, we have found that percentage change in the mean surface area of wound in insulin group is 79.4%. The percentage change in mean of wound surface area of wound in group B (phenytoin group) was 59.3%, which is less than insulin group. There was significant change in the depth of wound in both the group, but in insulin group, it is better than phenytoin group.

Authors and Affiliations

Sanjeev Rao M, Bhushan Kumar G. C, Anand Acharya

Keywords

Related Articles

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT TUMORS OF HYPOPHARYNX IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL

INTRODUCTION: Malignant growths of Hypo Pharynx are one of the common Head and Neck malignancies in India. Males are commonly affected due to their smoking habit and use of Tobacco products, chewing habits. The combined...

ASSOCIATION OF ELEVATED CARDIAC BIOMARKERS WITH MORTALITY AFTER ACUTE EXACERBATION OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is commonly seen in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) is a marker of ventricular dysfunction and troponin T of myocardial necros...

A STUDY OF OCULAR MANIFESTATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV-AIDS INFECTION AND CORRELATION WITH CD4 COUNT

BACKGROUND The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is one of the most feared infectious diseases of the late 20th century. The eye is an organ with wide spectrum of HIV-related m...

A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING PROGNOSTIC OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH RETINAL DETACHMENT TREATED WITH SCLERAL BUCKLING SURGERY

BACKGROUND Retinal detachment affects significant number of general population and needs procedures with profound surgical morbidity, certain times multiple procedures. High myopia, Ocular trauma, Ocular surgery, Family...

A STUDY ON OUTBREAK OF CARBAPENEM PLUS COLISTIN-RESISTANT KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE SEPSIS IN NEWBORNS IN A NURSERY OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

BACKGROUND A retrospective study was performed in a nursery of a tertiary care hospital in Jamshedpur, India, between March 2016 and July 2016. There was an outbreak of carbapenem+colistin resistant Klebsiella during tha...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP220253
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/623
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sanjeev Rao M, Bhushan Kumar G. C, Anand Acharya (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF LOCAL INSULIN VERSUS TOPICAL PHENYTOIN IN DIABETIC FOOT ULCER. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(51), 3145-3148. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-220253