A Comparative Study of Hyperbaric 0.5% Levobupivacaine with Bupivacaine 0.5% for Spinal Anaesthesia in Elective Surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 12

Abstract

Background: Subarachnoid block is popular and commonly used worldwide. The advantage of an awake patient, minimal drug cost and rapid patient turnover has made this the method of choice for many surgical procedures. Among the popular drugs used for subarachnoid block are bupivacaine and and its enantiomer Levobupivacaine. Objectives: A clinical study to compare the effect of spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective below umbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: 60 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status class1 and 2 patients with 18 to 70 years of age posted for elective lower limb surgeries under subarachnoid block technique were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups. Group L received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% levo bupivacaine [total 3.5ml], Isobaric levobupivacaine made hyperbaric by adding 0.5ml of 50% dextrose to 3ml of levobupivacaine, Group B received intrathecal 15mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.5ml of normal saline.[total 3.5ml]. Results: Group L and Group B had similar onset of sensory blockade. Group L had delayed onset of motor blockade, lesser degree of motor blockade and lesser quality of intraoperative anaesthesia, similar level of sensory and maximum upper spread of sensory blockade, time taken for two segment regression time and duration of motor blockade but shorter duration of analgesia when compared to Group B. Conclusion: Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine remains effective choice than hyperbaric 0.5% levobupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in elective surgeries, But hyperbaric levobupivacaine is also a better option for shorter procedures and outpatient spinal anaesthesia.

Authors and Affiliations

Girish B. K.

Keywords

Related Articles

Ultrasound-Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block Using Bupivacaine 0.25% vs Ropivacaine 0.2% For Post-Operative Analgesia in Caesarean Section

Introduction: Present study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.2% Ropivacaine in Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block under ultrasound guidance as a part of a multimodal analgesi...

A Study of Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia as an Adjuvant to Lignocaine

Context: Dexmedetomidine has been a prime matter of subject studies in research over it with its comparison with various other agents as it possesses properties like sedation and analgesia. Aims: To study the effectivene...

Efficacy of Caudal Ropivacaine Vs Bupivacaine in Paediatric Population

Introduction: Caudal anaesthesia has formed a “Corner Stone” in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Bupivacaine is commonly used for caudal analgesia. Newer drugs like Ropivacaine is more cardio-stable and produces less mot...

Effect of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine on Haemodynamic and Recovery Responses During Tracheal Extubation: A Randomised DoubleBlind Comparative Study

Background and Aims: Emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation are associated with transient surge in catecholamines due to sympathetic stimulation causing hypertension, tachycardia, myocardial ischaemia etc. Va...

Spinal Anaesthesia with Midline and Paramedian Technique in Pregnant Patients undergoing Lower Segment Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia

Background and AIMS: Subarachnoid blockade is widely used due to its simplicity, low cost and reduced complications due to general anaesthesia. Subarachnoid space can be approached from midline or paramedian approach (PM...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP550135
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51218.8
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Girish B. K. (2018). A Comparative Study of Hyperbaric 0.5% Levobupivacaine with Bupivacaine 0.5% for Spinal Anaesthesia in Elective Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(12), 2013-2020. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-550135