A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Patients Having Cholelithiasis (Gall Stones)

Journal Title: New Indian Journal of Surgery - Year 2019, Vol 10, Issue 4

Abstract

Background: Cholelithiasis is a common cause of morbidity among Indians with female predominance and its treatment has shown a decisive shift from open to minimally invasive surgery, prevalence rate ranging from 10 to 20%1 most of them are asymptomatic for a long time. With advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) apart from shift from open cholecystectomy (OC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is benefit of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and early return to normal activity. LC is cosmetically better when compared to OC. But some difficulty of LC in early phase of surgical practice is long operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage. Methods: A prospective study of 50 cases of gall stone carried out in district hospital Kalaburgi which was attached to ESIC Medical College Kalaburgi, between October 2017 and November 2018 with aim of comparing open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients are divided randomly into two groups: group A underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and group B underwent open cholecystectomy. Pros and cons of both procedures is explained in detail to the patient. Result: Duration of surgery is longer in OC than LC, 75.10 minutes versus 45.15 minutes, mean duration of postoperative pain 18 hours in group A and 30 hours in group B patients, the mean period of hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.5 days in group B patients, and postoperative food resumed in 1.2 days in group A and 2.5 days in group B and surgical site infection is higher in group B than group A. Conclusion: Minimal invasive surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is better than open cholecystectomy (OC) as first choice interms of less postoperative pain, less hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection and early return to work.

Authors and Affiliations

Md Ehtesham Afzal

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of Biochemical Renal Parameters in Burn Patients

Burn is a serious systemic illness not only injury to the skin which is followed by various serious complications such as infections, shock, renal failure etc. Renal failure has been well recognized complication of burns...

Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernias

Surgical management of groin hernias continues to attract the interest of General surgeons as it is the most common surgery performed in surgical practice. Over 80 variants of techniques have been tried; the time tested...

A Retrospective Study of Preoperative Predictive Factors of Strangulation in Intestinal Obstruction

methodology to prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy while minimizing the chance of overlooking strangulation obstruction causing intestinal ischemia. Our aim was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with strangu...

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scoring in Assessing the Incidence and Severity of Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis

Introduction: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a simple and objective score that allows for calculation of both the number and the severity of organ dysfunction in six organ systems. It is a six-or...

Evaluation of Utility of Alvarado Scoring System in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis at a Tertiary Care Centre of Dakshina Kannada

Acute appendicitis is the commonest ailment presenting at the department of general surgery. A number of clinical scoring systems have been developed for assessing right lower Quadrant abdominal pain for suspected append...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP671182
  • DOI 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.10419.4
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Md Ehtesham Afzal (2019). A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Patients Having Cholelithiasis (Gall Stones). New Indian Journal of Surgery, 10(4), 375-378. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-671182