A Comparative Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicectomy is one of the commonest procedures in general surgery. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is likely to have less postoperative pain, decreased wound infection, better cosmesis and and early return to routine work. Objectives of the study: Laparoscopic procedure for appendicectomy is compared with open surgical technique with respect to: • Duration of surgery • Post operative pain and duration of analgesic • Post operative Complications • Post operative length of hospital stay • Return to routine work Materials & methods: This is a prospective comparative study from November 2012 to October 2014 involving 100 cases, 50 open and 50 laparoscopic appendicectomy,which were randomly selected and were operated in Department of surgery,Kannyakumari Medical College. Results: In present study pain score was 2.7 +/- 0.9 for open group as compared to 1.3+/- 0.5 in lap group (P<0.05) because of longer incision,stretch of muscles and woundvinfection. Post operative complications like vomiting was lower 8% in laparoscopic group in contrast to 36% in open group (P<0.05) and ileus was lower in laparoscopic group with 17.3 +/- 7.1 and for open group 30.8 +/- 8.9 with P<0.05.There is significant reduction in incidence of post operative wound infection in lap group 4% as compared to open group 26% (P<0.05).Duration of hospital stay was significantly lower for lap group 2.8 +/- 0.9 as than open group 4 +/- 2.9. The return to normal activity was earlier for lap group 8+/-3.15 days than open group 13.7 +/-3.15 days. Duration of surgery for open appendicectomy was 48.2+/-12.4 while that for lap appendicectomy was 68.5 +/- 20.3 Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is better than open appendectomy in selected patients with acute or recurrent appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

S Carbin Joseph, C Danny Darlington

Keywords

Related Articles

Novel Method to Assess Fetal Head Station in Labour Correlation between clinical method of determination of fetal head station and transperineal ultrasound method of determination of fetal head station

Current obstetric practice strives to avoid difficult vaginal deliveries. Digital vaginal examination remains the “gold standard” for identifying the fetal head station and it is highly subjective, experience dependent a...

Clinical Profile and Visual Outcome of Ocular Injuries in a Tertiary Hospital in Northern India

Aim: To identify the various types of ocular injury presenting in a tertiary hospital in northern India..Material & Methods: Hospital-based, retrospective study conducted over a period of one year. A total of 100 patient...

Current Trends in Performance of Forced Degradation Studies and Stability Indicating Studies of Drugs

The stability of a drug substance (or) drug product is a vital parameter which may affect purity, safety and potency and. Changes in drug stability can threat patient safety by formation of a toxic degradation product or...

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Preterm Labour and Its Maternal and Perinatal Outcome

Asymptomatic bacteriuria is a condition in which larger than normal numbers of bacteria are present in the urine but without any symptoms. In pregnancy the anatomical and physiological changes in the maternal urinary tra...

Arrested Caries Lesion: Minimal Invasive Treatment ApproachA case report

Esthetic treatment of stained arrested caries lesions (ACLs) has mostly been done using invasive restorative techniques. The aim of this paper was to propose and report the efficacy of a conservative approach based on de...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP595613
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1604098286.
  • Views 43
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S Carbin Joseph, C Danny Darlington (2017). A Comparative Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(4), 82-86. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-595613