A comparative study of oral premedication in children with ketamine and fentanyl

Journal Title: Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: To do a comparative study of oral premedication in children with Ketamine and Fentanyl. Materials and methods: A randomized prospective study was conducted in 50 children scheduled for various surgical procedures in hospital. : In this study, the children were divided into two groups. Group A: Ketamine 6 mg/kg, Group B: Fentanyl 15 µg/kg. The groups were assessed on the basis of sedation, separation from the parents (anxiolysis), response to venepuncture, acceptance of face mask. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate were continuously measured.Results: All children posted for elective surgeries were in the age group between 2 and 8 years. The mean age in group A was 3.84+1.46 years and in group B it was 3.6 + 1.32 years. The difference in the mean age was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The two groups were more or less homogenous. The mean weight for group A was 14.08 + 2.8 kg and group B was 13.96 + 2.52 kg. The difference in the mean weight was not statistically significant. (p> 0.05). Similarly, the sex between the two groups were comparable. The mean height for group A was 155.70 + 2.74cm and group B was 155.60 + 2.83cm. The difference in the mean sex was not statistically significant. The sedation score has degree of freedom 3, Chi square of 2.14, for significance at 0.05 level, Chi square should be greater than or equal to 7.81. The parental separation score has degree of freedom 3, Chi square of 5.81, for significance at 0.05 level, Chi square should be greater than or equal to 7.81. The sedation score has degree of freedom 3, Chi square of 7.99, for significance at 0.05 level, chisquare should be greater than or equal to 7.81. The sedation score has degree of freedom 3, chisquare of 6.51, for significance at 0.05 level, chisquare should be greater than or equal to 7.81. Conclusion: In conculsion ketamine and fentanyl are equally effective premedicants. However, oral ketamine may be preferable to fentanyl because of lower cost.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Srinivas Reddy

Keywords

Related Articles

Riedel’s thyroiditis presenting as large retropharyngeal goiter - A rare case

The thyroid gland lies in the anterior triangle of the neck in close approximation to the larynx and the trachea. The extension of an enlarged thyroid gland outside the normal confines of the thyroid bed is well known. A...

Retroperitoneal Angiomyolipoma: Rare Entity

Extrarenal angiomyolipomas (ERAMLs) are rare tumors that present as incidentalomas upon imaging for other conditions. Retroperitoneal ERAMLs present a unique challenge from a diagnostic and treatment standpoint as they c...

A comparative study of intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal tramadol for prolongation of neuraxial blockade analgesia with 0.5% bupivacaine in orthopaedic surgery

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is advantageous in that it uses a small dose of the anaesthetic, is simple to perform and offers a rapid onset of action, reliable surgical analgesia and good muscle relaxation.Effective...

A study on varicose veins cases attending to Government General Hospital, Anantapur

Background: Varicose veins are dilated, elongated, and torturous veins usually seen over the lower extremities of the body. They are usually asymptomatic in most of the subjects but may present with complications like ed...

Aqueous extract of Hibiscus Sabdariffa calyx modulates gentamicin activity in rats

Gentamicin have been shown to generate free radicals .This study investigated modulatory potential of aqueous extract of Hibiscus Sabdariffa calyx with gentamicin in rats. Thirty rats weighing between 150-200g...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP524529
  • DOI 10.21276/apjhs.2016.3.3.9
  • Views 200
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Srinivas Reddy (2016). A comparative study of oral premedication in children with ketamine and fentanyl. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 61-67. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-524529