A comparative study of outcome of displaced mid shaft clavicle fracture managed by operative versus conservative treatment

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: With the increasing incidence of clavicle fractures due to road traffic accidents more emphasis is being given in the management of these fractures which brings about the debate of whether clavicle mid shaft fractures treated operatively yield better results compared to traditional conservative management. The incidence of clavicle fracture ranges from 36 to 64 per 100,000 people every year. The treatment over the years has been to manage midshaft fractures of the clavicle conservatively, however there has been a recent trend in the increase in the operative management of these fractures which may be done by either plate fixation or intramedullary nailing. There have been various papers published to compare the study between surgical and conservative management in the treatment of clavicle fractures. There has been no conclusion regarding the debate between conservative and operative management of these fractures so we decided to bring about a comparison study between patient-oriented outcome and complication rates following conservative treatment and those after operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Objectives: To compare the functional outcome and complication rates in patients following conservative management and those after operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Materials and Methods: The sample size included 50 patients with a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle who presented to Dr D.Y. Patil Hospital, Pimpri, Pune from Feb 2017 to Aug 2017 and who were treated either by conservative or operative methods of treatment and who were in regular follow up. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant scores was used for Functional assessment in these patients which was done at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Complications, if any in these patient were recorded. Results: Better DASH and Constant scores along with better anatomic reduction were found in the group managed Operatively than in the group which was managed Conservatively. Conclusion: Operative treatment resulted in early return to function and better anatomic reduction as compared to conservative treatment but at the cost of complications like infection and other implant related problems.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Clevio

Keywords

Related Articles

Steffee plating in management of fracture spine

Introduction: The diagnosis of a broken back has carried an ominous prognosis, since antiquity. In the writings of ancient Egyptians, as recorded in Edwn Smith papers, traumatic quadriplegia was considered a, “condition...

The orientation of acetabular component in total hip replacement using transverse acetabular ligament as a guide

Introduction: Acetabular component placement is a crucial determinant in outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. Malalignment predisposes to impingement, increased rate of dislocation, wear of the bearing, osteolysis,...

Management of fractures of proximal tibia by various treatment modalities: A study of 56 patients

Objectives: To compare the end results obtained after treating patients of proximal tibial fractures with various modalities Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out for patients treated by various m...

Plate fixation versus elastic nailing for displaced clavicle fractures: A comparative study

Background: A prospective comparative study carried out to compare the efficacy of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation, for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture, over each other. Materials and Methods: 62 patient...

Maximising stability after revision hip arthroplasty for vancouver B periprosthetic fractures

Objectives: The risk of hip dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty can be as high as 27% following surgery for periprosthetic fractures. A novel technique described by the senior authors in 2015, involving a t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP487535
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i3c.22
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Clevio (2018). A comparative study of outcome of displaced mid shaft clavicle fracture managed by operative versus conservative treatment. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 4(3), 127-129. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-487535