A comparative study of the rule of unjustified enrichment in Egypt and Iran

Abstract

An unfair acquisition or using without any reason has been accepted as a new source of commitment. In foreign law and in the Romeo- Germanic system it was positioned beside contract and civil responsibility of fault. This rule that nobody can be prosperous on another's loss had been a moral rule that find its way in the legal system. The entrance of this rule into the legal system was due to the lack of specific solution in the quarrels that occurs between demanding and demanded. And the demanded hasn’t done any fault but it was unfairly on the loss of wealthy demanding. The moral and fair foundation of this rule caused this rule to be accepted in most of the legal systems. Although In Egyptian and Iranian law there is no source for accepting this rule but for confirmation of this law some lawyers have used the foreign and Islamic Law. By studying and applying a comparative analysis of this rule in Iran and Egypt in a historical framework and also of its foundation which is an independent organization and the consequences of this rule we can understand that it has been coined for the sake of bridging the gap of legal rights in the Romeo- Germanic system.

Authors and Affiliations

Nasrin Alipour

Keywords

Related Articles

The More Capable Management, the Better Earning Quality

Investors are willing to devote their resources to companies with excellent performance and one of the criteria of productivity for the company is profitability. Investor's over emphasize on the profitability reminds tha...

Manuchehri: the Poet of Nature

The description of nature and it beauties within the poetry of Manuchri Damghani, the poet of early 5th century A.H has got a special status. These young poet and portrait painter had fluent knowledge of Arabic literatur...

Investigation of ERP Implementation Benefits and Defections in Education

With the computerisation of business activities in higher education institutions ERP vendors quickly perceived a new market opportunity. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are highly complex information systems....

Urban Areas Security Studies Depending on External Socioeconomic Parameters (the Study Case: Chaluos)

Locations, time and human beings are the three main effective elements forming criminality behaviors, scholars have found through the environmental crime committing factors recognition. So the differences between the loc...

The Comparison of Emotional Processing and Self-compassion in Bully and Victim Students

The present study was performed with the aim of comparing emotional processing and self-compassion in bully and victim students. It was a cross casual-comparative study. The population consisted all male and female bully...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP637734
  • DOI -
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nasrin Alipour (2012). A comparative study of the rule of unjustified enrichment in Egypt and Iran. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 1(0), 209-218. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-637734