A comparative study of the similarities and differences between ‘assisting’ and ‘causing’ within two rules: the prohibition of ‘assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 47, Issue 103
Abstract
Assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’ are two important jurisprudential rules with crucial implications. ‘Assisting’ and ‘causing’ as derived from those rules have a lot in common. At the same time, what their differences are seems to be an important issue. The subtle differences between the two sometimes lead to confused identifications and examples of each might be mistaken with the other. We have examined the differences between the two within five areas. These are as follows: discussion of centrality or non-centrality of each, sobriety of the assistant as condition or non-condition, intention as a condition for the truth of the two issues, inclusion of the two rules in the context of abandonment or non-abandonment (continuity), and expression of obligatory and situational rulings on ‘assisting’ and ‘causing.’
Authors and Affiliations
Ehsan Ahangari, Asghar Agha Mahdavi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190662
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.34296
- Views 103
- Downloads 0
The Prophet’s (S.A.W.) Actual (Fi‘lī) Tradition and its Status in Inference of Rulings from the Viewpoint of the Two Major Sects (Farīqayn)
The Prophetic action and behavior as a part of tradition is regarded as a kind of evidence and legal plea. Explanation of the concept and nature of the Prophet’s (S.A.W.) action and the two sects’ analysis of this ration...
Familial Immunity in Offences against Properties and Ownership
Financial and economic relationships are undeniable realities and impressive factors in familial relations, and there are reciprocal interactions between these two. The existence of this relationship has caused the famil...
Legal Sanction for Non-observance of Expediency in Power of Attorney
Power of attorney (PA) contract is among the specified contracts that are widely used in society and people’s legal relations, because on one hand, people are not compelled to directly vindicate their rights and, on the...
The Extent of the Validity of Isolated Tradition (Khabar) in Muḥaqqiq Ardabīlī’s School of Thought
One of the most highly applicable evidences for inference of legal precepts is the isolated tradition, whose acceptance, rejection, or limitation is highly effective in the consequences of inference. Muḥaqqiq Ardabīlī, a...
A critical view of ‘the necessity of imprisonment of the insolvent in paying the dower’
The dower is the first financial debt which established incumbent upon the husband after the realization of marriage. The wife has the right to demand the debt from the husband and then obtain its possession. If after th...