A comparative study of the similarities and differences between ‘assisting’ and ‘causing’ within two rules: the prohibition of ‘assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 47, Issue 103
Abstract
Assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’ are two important jurisprudential rules with crucial implications. ‘Assisting’ and ‘causing’ as derived from those rules have a lot in common. At the same time, what their differences are seems to be an important issue. The subtle differences between the two sometimes lead to confused identifications and examples of each might be mistaken with the other. We have examined the differences between the two within five areas. These are as follows: discussion of centrality or non-centrality of each, sobriety of the assistant as condition or non-condition, intention as a condition for the truth of the two issues, inclusion of the two rules in the context of abandonment or non-abandonment (continuity), and expression of obligatory and situational rulings on ‘assisting’ and ‘causing.’
Authors and Affiliations
Ehsan Ahangari, Asghar Agha Mahdavi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190662
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.34296
- Views 105
- Downloads 0
Possibility of Qiṣāṣ (Retaliated Punishment) of Father by the Child in Legal Opinions and Penal Laws
The impossibility of qiṣāṣ of father for murdering the child is unanimously agreed upon by the Imāmī jursprudents; however, presuming that the father does not directly commit murder of the child and the child inherits th...
A Different Research on the Traditions of Istiṣḥāb with the Approach to Reviving the Rule of Certitude
The rule of certitude has been brought up as one of the five pivotal principles of jurisprudence, which in itself includes several principles such as istṣḥāb (presumed continuity), but over time it has been dissociated....
An analysis and criticism of the arguments for the individuality of the hijab
The hijāb is a religious obligation based on numerous sources and jurisprudential arguments. Some consider the hijāb as an individual and not a social issue, arguing that it essentially does not fall in the sphere of sta...
A Deliberation on the Necessity of Imitating the Most Learned
The present article studies the issue of the “necessity of imitating the most learned (a‘lam)”. To this end, while comparing the evidences of the proponents and the opponents of the necessity of imitating the most learne...
Theory of Social Understanding of Statutes; Principles, Application
The theory of Muḥammad Jawād Mughniya entitled “social understanding of statutes”, is the evolved mechanism for the refinement of the basis of a ruling (tanqīḥ-i manāṭ) in legal reasoning (ijtihād) process, which has bee...