A Comparative Study To Evaluate Factors Responsible For Clinical Outcome Of Periradicular Surgery

Abstract

Background: Endodontic treatment is usually performed in teeth with periapical lesions. However, in some cases the pathology persists. Thus, periapical surgery has to be performed. It is considered to be the last treatment option before the extraction of a tooth. The main objective of periapical surgery is to seal the root canal system, thereby enabling healing by forming a barrier between the irritants within the confines of the affected root and the periapical tissue. Aim: To evaluate factors responsible for clinical outcome of periradicular surgery. Materials and method: The present study was conducted by combined effort of the department of we selected 25 patients scheduled for periradicular surgery. The surgical procedure was performed under local anesthesia. For the postoperative assessment, radiographs were done postoperatively. Analgesics were prescribed to the patients and sutures were removed after 4-7 days. Follow up was done at 6 to 12 months postoperatively and assessment of treatment success was done clinically and radiographically. The Cases with presence of pain, tenderness to percussion, tenderness to palpation of buccal mucosa, swelling of buccal mucosa were termed as clinical failures. The evaluation of case was also done radiographically. Results: We observed that 18 patients had preoperatively complaint of pain. The success rate of periradicular surgery in these patients is 86.7%. Similarly, significant difference was observed in preoperative clinical symptoms of tender to percussion, Presence of fistula, and resurgery cases. Conclusion: Within the limitations of current study, we conclude that tenderness on percussion, presence of fistula and resurgery cases are strongly associated with the success of periradicular surgery.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaswant toor, Radhvi . , Kirandeep Kaur, Parneet Kaur, Ssatwant Singh, Harpreet singh

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of different treatment modalities for the treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A comparative study

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is chronic inflammatory disease which presents frequently in the fourth decade of life and affects women more than men in a ratio of 1.4:1. Treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus...

Assessment of causes of failures in endodontic therapy- A clinical study

Background: Endodontic therapy or root canal therapy is a treatment sequence for the infected pulp of a tooth Abstract which results in the elimination of infection and the protection of the decontaminated tooth from fut...

A Prospective Study To Know Socio-Demographic Profile In Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Admitted At A Tertiary Health Care And Teaching Hospital In Himachal Pradesh, North India

Background: India alone is burdened with approximately 25% of cardiovascular-related deaths and a of morbidity and mortality. The present study was planned and commenced to know the socio-demographic profile in patients...

Assessment of prevalence of different benign lesions of the oral cavity affecting a known population: A retrospective study

Benign oral soft tissue masses encompass a wide variety of mass lesions. Characteristically they Hence; we planned the present study to assess the prevalence of different benign lesions of the oral cavity affecting a kn...

Correlation of Dermatoglyphic variations and Breast cancer in Kashmir Population : A clinical study

Background: Cancer screening is the main weapon for early detection at a pre invasive or premalignant stage. Dermatoglyphic traits are formed under genetic control similar to breast cancer sodermatoglyphics can represent...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP519912
  • DOI -
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaswant toor, Radhvi . , Kirandeep Kaur, Parneet Kaur, Ssatwant Singh, Harpreet singh (2017). A Comparative Study To Evaluate Factors Responsible For Clinical Outcome Of Periradicular Surgery. Harsukh Educational Charitable Society International Journal of Community Health and Medical Research, 3(3), 85-88. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-519912