A Comparative Study To Evaluate The Fracture Resistance of Posterior Teeth Restored With Ceramic Inlay And Hybrid Composite Restoration – An In-Vitro Study.

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 5

Abstract

Background & Objectives: The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with Ceramic inlay and Hybrid composite restoration. Methods: Thirty intact, non-carious, human maxillary premolar teeth that were collected. The thirty teeth were randomly divided into 3 experimental group of 10 teeth each , Group A, Group B and Group C. Group A was consisted of sound/unprepared teeth (control). In Group B mesio-occlusal Class-II cavity was prepared in each tooth and restored with Hybrid composite resin. In Group C mesio-occlusal Class-II inlay cavities were prepared and restored with Ceramic inlays. Thereafter, the specimens all three groups were individually tested in a universal testing machine. All specimens were loaded by compression force until the specimens fractured. The ultimate fracture load was recorded. Data collected by experiments were computerized and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. Statistical analysis was done using Unpaired student’s t test. Results: The results showed that Group C had highest kilo newton (KN) values for fracture resistance compared to Group B . Null hypothesis was rejected as fracture resistance of Group C was significantly higher than Group B . However, Group A and Group B did not differ significantly in fracture resistance from eachother. Between Group C and Group A the average kilonewton (KN) value for fracture resistance for Group C was significantly higher than Group A. Conclusion: From this in-vitro study it can be concluded that adhesively bonded restorations such as composite and ceramic inlays are good and optimal replacement for lost tooth structure.Ceramic inlay is better restorative alternative as compared to direct composite resin as far as the fracture resistance is concerned.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. M Kala, Dr. Mayank Shailat

Keywords

Related Articles

Religion, Nutrition and Socioeconomic Factors: Influence on Head and Neck Cancer

Background: Head and neck cancer is common in several regions of the world. Multiple factors can be associated with occurrence of head and neck cancer. Our study was aimed at finding the influence of religion, nutrition,...

Invasive Cervical Resorption: An Insidious Form of External Tooth Resorption

Invasive cervical resorption (ICR) is an unusual form of external root resorption which initiates below the epithelial attachment and coronal aspect of supporting alveolar process to be precise zone of connective tissue...

Outcome of Management of Diaphragmatic Hernia; Review of Three Year Experience

Diaphragmatic hernia (cdh) is a defect in the dome of diaphragm, more often in left and postero-lateral that permits the herniation of abdominal contents into the thorax. The lungs hypoplasia, pulmonary hypertension and...

Post auricular (extracardiac) fetal rhabdomyoma – a case report

Fetal rhabdomyoma, is a tumor originating in striated muscle, most commonly in the heart.Extracardiac rhabdomyomas most commonly occur in the head and neck region. They warrant a distinctive diagnosis and need to be diff...

Compound fractures of hand: Study on fracture fixation and functional recovery

A variety of fractures of the hand are occurring due to Road traffic accidents, mechanization and with the tools used in agriculture. It is very common to find a compound fracture of the hand in the Emergency Room. The g...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP595891
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1605012329.
  • Views 45
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. M Kala, Dr. Mayank Shailat (2017). A Comparative Study To Evaluate The Fracture Resistance of Posterior Teeth Restored With Ceramic Inlay And Hybrid Composite Restoration – An In-Vitro Study.. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(5), 23-29. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-595891