A Comparison between Etomidate and Propofol for Sedation in Colonoscopy
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
Propofol has been the widely used sedative agent for colonoscopy.However, in elderly population, propofol causes an exaggerated cardiorespiratory depression. Etomidate causes sedation with minimal effect on cardiovascular and respiratory system. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the hemodynamic, respiratory and recovery profiles of Etomidate versus Propofol for sedation in colonoscopy. Secondary objective was to evaluate the effect on pain post colonoscopy with these drugs. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients aged 60 years and above, for colonoscopy were randomly divided into two groups.All patients received fentanyl 1mcg/kg. Group E received etomidate 0.1mg/kg over one minute, followed by 510 mcg/ kg/minute. Group P received propofol 0.5mg/kg over one minute, followed by 0.05mg/ kg/minute. Colonoscope was inserted when Ramsay sedation score was 4. The time required for induction, vitals every 5 minutes, and the time for modified aldrette score to reach 9 were noted. Visual analog pain score was assessed in all patients. Results: During the procedure the fall in heart rate, mean arterial pressure was significantly more in group P than in group E (p <0.001). The fall in oxygen saturation was greater in group P but was not significant. The time taken to induce the patients was the same in the two groups.The recovery time was significantly longer in group E(p<0.001). There was no difference in the visual analog score of pain. Bradycardia, hypotension and hypoxia were encountered in group P. Conclusion: Etomidate fentanyl sedation is safer than propofol fentanyl combination in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Authors and Affiliations
Swati Bisht
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP464978
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.4217.19
- Views 90
- Downloads 0
Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation by using Oral Ivabradine
Introduction: Laryngoscopy gives rise to a stress response that is seen as rise in heart rate and blood pressure and as dysrhythmia. Such changes are at peak immediately after intubation and can be dangerous for those ha...
Pain on Injection: Comparison between Propofol LCT vs Propofol MCT-LCT
Background and Aims: Propofol is widelyused for induction andmaintenance of anaesthesia. It has the disadvantage of causing sharp pain on injection which can interfere with smooth induction of anaesthesia. The aim of the...
Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant to Propofol on Intubation Conditions during Fiberoptic Intubation
Fiberoptic intubation (FOI) is recommended for patients with anticipated difficult airway, failed intubation, unstable cervical spine injurywhere optimum positioning for laryngoscopy is difficult to achieve. Fentany l, a...
Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anaesthesia for Modified Radical Mastectomy in a Bronchiectasis Patient
General anaesthesia is the gold standard technique for breast cancer surgery but risks of general anaesthesia outweigh the benefits particularly in patients with known cardio pulmonary disorders. Here we discussed a pati...
A Comparative Study of Post Operative Side Effects between Spinal Bupivacaine Plus Buprenorphine and Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block Plus Spinal Bupivacaine Used for Analgesia
Aim and objective: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative side effects produced by spinal bupivacaine plus buprenorphine with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks plus spinal bupivacaine. Settings and Design: Ran...