A COMPARISON OF McCOY LARYNGOSCOPE AND MCGRATH VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPES FOR TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN PATIENTS WITH IMMOBILIZED CERVICAL SPINE

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2015, Vol 2, Issue 32

Abstract

: Expert airway management is the most essential requirement of an anesthesiologist. Difficult and failed intubation is the leading causes of anesthetic related morbidity and mortality. AIM OF STUDY: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of McCoy laryngoscope and McGrath video laryngoscope in tracheal intubation in patients using Manual in-line stabilization (MILS) for cervical spine injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh on 60 patients aged 20–70, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III, posted for elective surgery for cervical spine injury under general anesthesia. The patients were assigned to two groups. One group was named as MC where McCoy laryngoscope was used, other group named as MG, where McGrath video laryngoscope was used for laryngoscopy during tracheal intubation. Two groups were compared on the basis of demographic data, airway examination, comparison of visualization of vocal cords with McCoy laryngoscope and video laryngoscope and comparison of laryngoscope time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between male and female sex. Most of the patients falls into Mallampati score I (60%), followed by score II and III (25 and 14% respectively). Statistically highly significant improvement in laryngoscope view was noted with video laryngoscope than with McCoy laryngoscope with Chi-square value=49.52; DF=10; p-value=0.000(highly significant). Statistically highly significant difference was seen in effective laryngoscopy time of McCoy and Video laryngoscope. CONCLUSION: We conclude McGrath video laryngoscope is superior to McCoy laryngoscope in terms of providing better intubating conditions in patients requiring MILS, though there is a little prolongation of effective laryngoscope time.

Authors and Affiliations

Annapurna Sarma Bhamidipati, Subbalakshmi T. D. P, Srinivasa Rao Tatavarti

Keywords

Related Articles

PEDIATRIC HEAD INJURIES, MECHANISM TO MANAGEMENT: EXPERIENCE OF A SINGLE CENTER

INTRODUCTION Head injury is very common in modern life. Patients of any age group may have head injury however mechanism of head injury, pathophysiology and outcome of head injury is quite different in adults as compared...

CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF PAPULOSQUAMOUS SKIN LESIONS

BACKGROUND Papulosquamous lesions form the largest group of skin diseases. Since, they are all characterized by scaling papules or plaques, clinical confusion may result in their diagnosis, hence definitive histopatholog...

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY BETWEEN RISPERIDONE AND HALOPERIDOL IN DRUG NAIVE ACUTE AND TRANSIENT PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS

BACKGROUND To compare the efficacy between risperidone and haloperidol in drug naïve acute and transient psychotic disorder patients attending Government Stanley Medical College Hospital by assessing the mean changes in...

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE FOR PREMEDICATION IN PAEDIATRIC SURGICAL PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Surgery and anaesthesia cause considerable distress and psychological consequences especially in paediatric patients. The need of the hour is to assess the efficacy of premedicant drugs given through different...

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY DUE TO MEDICAL DISORDERS

In this study 100 Acute Kidney Injury patients were analyse there was 57 male and 43 female, the medium age were 41.4. Oliguria AKI predominate (88%). Acute diarrhoeal diseases was the leading cause of AKI in this study...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP229450
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2015/660
  • Views 62
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Annapurna Sarma Bhamidipati, Subbalakshmi T. D. P, Srinivasa Rao Tatavarti (2015). A COMPARISON OF McCOY LARYNGOSCOPE AND MCGRATH VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPES FOR TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN PATIENTS WITH IMMOBILIZED CERVICAL SPINE. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 2(32), 4695-4700. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-229450