A comparison of the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets that have been treated with various light-emitting diode intensities and curing times: In-vitro research

Journal Title: International Journal of Experimental Research and Review - Year 2023, Vol 34, Issue 5

Abstract

The study aims to test the effects of LED light at three different power settings (500mW/cm2, 1000mW/cm2& 1500m W/cm2) and three different exposure times (5sec, 10sec & 20sec) adhesive composites for use with stainless steel orthodontic brackets, and their shear bond strengths. Current In-vitro work used 120 teeth, mostly premolars, separated into 10 equal groups of 12. After the crowns of the teeth were exposed by mounting them vertically into self-heal acrylics, the buccal-enamel exterior was prepared for bonding (PEA) 0.022”x 0.028” stainless steel premolar bracket using a thin layer of light cure adhesive primer and paste (Transbond-XT-3M Unitek Monrovia, Calif). Brackets in Group 1 comprising the Control group treated by usual halogen light source for forty sec, in remaining 9 groups (Experimental group) three commercially available LED curing light units i.e., Woodpecker, Guilin, Guangxi, China; Stealth Soft Equinox, Denmark, Holland; Radii plus, SDI, Australia, having three different light intensity 500mW/cm2, 1000mW/cm2, 1500mW/cm2 respectively were used to bond the brackets at three contact time (5/10/20 sec). The universal testing equipment was used to determine the shear bond strength of each specimen. The uppermost average SBS was found in the group cured with LED of intensity 1500 mW/cm2 for 20 sec (20.08 + 4.82 MPa) which was statistically significant compared the to control group (12.72 + 2.42 MPa). The lowest mean SBS values were obtained for groups cured with LED of intensity 500 mW/cm2 even at different curing times of 5, 10 and 20 sec i.e., 5.46 + 1.99 MPa, 8.77 + 2.38 Mpa and 11.24 + 2.59 MPa, respectively. Increasing the intensity of the LED light curing unit provides a clinically acceptable SBS even after reducing the curing times, thereby reducing the chairside time for bonding of orthodontic brackets.The study aims to test the effects of LED light at three different power settings (500mW/cm2, 1000mW/cm2& 1500m W/cm2) and three different exposure times (5sec, 10sec & 20sec) adhesive composites for use with stainless steel orthodontic brackets, and their shear bond strengths. Current In-vitro work used 120 teeth, mostly premolars, separated into 10 equal groups of 12. After the crowns of the teeth were exposed by mounting them vertically into self-heal acrylics, the buccal-enamel exterior was prepared for bonding (PEA) 0.022”x 0.028” stainless steel premolar bracket using a thin layer of light cure adhesive primer and paste (Transbond-XT-3M Unitek Monrovia, Calif). Brackets in Group 1 comprising the Control group treated by usual halogen light source for forty sec, in remaining 9 groups (Experimental group) three commercially available LED curing light units i.e., Woodpecker, Guilin, Guangxi, China; Stealth Soft Equinox, Denmark, Holland; Radii plus, SDI, Australia, having three different light intensity 500mW/cm2, 1000mW/cm2, 1500mW/cm2 respectively were used to bond the brackets at three contact time (5/10/20 sec). The universal testing equipment was used to determine the shear bond strength of each specimen. The uppermost average SBS was found in the group cured with LED of intensity 1500 mW/cm2 for 20 sec (20.08 + 4.82 MPa) which was statistically significant compared the to control group (12.72 + 2.42 MPa). The lowest mean SBS values were obtained for groups cured with LED of intensity 500 mW/cm2 even at different curing times of 5, 10 and 20 sec i.e., 5.46 + 1.99 MPa, 8.77 + 2.38 Mpa and 11.24 + 2.59 MPa, respectively. Increasing the intensity of the LED light curing unit provides a clinically acceptable SBS even after reducing the curing times, thereby reducing the chairside time for bonding of orthodontic brackets.

Authors and Affiliations

Gananjay Patil, Santosh Kumar, Namrata Dogra, Jasmine Nindra, Satwashila Kadam, Krishna Yadav

Keywords

Related Articles

Graphene: the magic carbon derived biological weapon for human welfare

Graphene plays an etiologic role for the new edge drug designing in the area of therapeutic management of myriads of diseases. Several researchers have experimentally validated the use of graphene and its derivative eith...

Assessment and Analysis of Factors Impacting Stress in Students in Higher Educational Institutes in Delhi-NCR

Well-being is essential to lead a fulfilling and enjoyable life. Today's fast-paced world causes stress and strain, affecting physical and mental health. The study focuses on stress among students who are anxious owing t...

Social Media Disorder Scale: Structure, Reliability and Validity in Indian Context

India is a country that has seen a notable increase in the amount of time its citizens spend on the Internet. One of the primary drivers of internet usage is the widespread adoption of social media platforms. When there...

An efficient Android malware detection method using Borutashap algorithm

The Android operating system captures the largest global smartphone market share. However, its popularity and open-source nature have garnered the attention of cybercriminals. The landscape of Android malware has evolved...

Cancer therapy with Vinca Alkaloids

Vinca alkaloids are well known antimitotic or antimicrotubule agents, originally derived from the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (Apocynacea) and other Vinca plants. They have a wide spectrum of anticancer activity...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP722896
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v34spl.001
  • Views 30
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gananjay Patil, Santosh Kumar, Namrata Dogra, Jasmine Nindra, Satwashila Kadam, Krishna Yadav (2023). A comparison of the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets that have been treated with various light-emitting diode intensities and curing times: In-vitro research. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 34(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-722896