A Comparison Study Quality of Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Clonidine versus Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Midazolam
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most commonly used anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Despite of using long acting local anesthetic like Bupivacaine, the duration of anesthesia is short. Therefore, various drug combinations like Clonidine, Ketamine, Opioids etc. have been tried to prolong duration of analgesia. Methodology: This study was conducted among 60 participants GMERS Hospital, Valsad. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Thirty subjects were in each group who received either 0.5% heavy Bupivacaine 3 ml (15 mg) + Clonidine 0.3 ml (45 µg) (Group A) or 0.5% heavy Bupivacaine 3 ml (15 mg) + Midazolam 0.2 ml (1 mg) + 0.9% normal saline 0.1 ml (Group B). Time required for sensory block, motor blockade, level of sedation and post operatively pain measurement was assessed. Result: The present study showed that significant decrease in mean arterial pressure and heart rate at 30, 45 and 60 min in patients with adjuvant clonidine as compared to midazolam. Mean time for sensory onset, sensory regression to S2 from highest sensory level, two segment sensory regression, total duration of motor blockade and onset of grade-3 motor blockade in patient with adjuvant Clonidine was significantly higher as compared to adjuvant Midazolam. Post operatively there was no significant difference in mean postoperative systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, saturation and respiratory rate. Sedation score was also higher in patients with adjuvant Clonidine group. Most common reported adverse events with Clonidine was hypotension and bradycardia. Conclusion: Adjuvant Clonidine 45 μg intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5%) significantly prolongs duration of motor and sensory block. It provides adequate hemodynamic stability, prolongs postoperative analgesia without any significant side effects.
Authors and Affiliations
Mahesh M Patel
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP622199
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.15
- Views 79
- Downloads 0
Effect of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Administered as Mixture and Sequentially in Lower Abdominal Procedures
Objectives: To compare the effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine given mixed or sequential with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Method: 60 patients posted for elective lower abdominal procedures were...
A Comparative Study of Post Operative Side Effects between Spinal Bupivacaine Plus Buprenorphine and Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block Plus Spinal Bupivacaine Used for Analgesia
Aim and objective: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative side effects produced by spinal bupivacaine plus buprenorphine with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks plus spinal bupivacaine. Settings and Design: Ran...
Comparative Study of Isoflurane and Sevoflurane as an Inducing Agent in Paediatric Group
In the present study pediatric patients of ASA g1 & ASAII were selected and divided in two groups each consisting of 30 patients. Induction done by Isoflurane is labelled as “GroupA” and sevoflurane as “GroupB”. The a...
Pre-Emptive Oral Gabapentin for Postoperative Laproscopic Shoulder Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal
Background: In laparoscopic surgery acute postoperative shoulder tip pain is common entity despite of the use of new drugs and novel drug delivery modalities, studies have shown that acute post-operative pain continues t...
Efficacy of Laryngoscopy and Haemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation: A Comparitive Study between Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope
Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation plays a crucial role in administering general anaesthesia. Laryngoscopes ranging from simple rigid scope with light bulb to complex...