A Comparison Study Quality of Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Clonidine versus Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Midazolam
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 4
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most commonly used anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Despite of using long acting local anesthetic like Bupivacaine, the duration of anesthesia is short. Therefore, various drug combinations like Clonidine, Ketamine, Opioids etc. have been tried to prolong duration of analgesia. Methodology: This study was conducted among 60 participants GMERS Hospital, Valsad. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Thirty subjects were in each group who received either 0.5% heavy Bupivacaine 3 ml (15 mg) + Clonidine 0.3 ml (45 µg) (Group A) or 0.5% heavy Bupivacaine 3 ml (15 mg) + Midazolam 0.2 ml (1 mg) + 0.9% normal saline 0.1 ml (Group B). Time required for sensory block, motor blockade, level of sedation and post operatively pain measurement was assessed. Result: The present study showed that significant decrease in mean arterial pressure and heart rate at 30, 45 and 60 min in patients with adjuvant clonidine as compared to midazolam. Mean time for sensory onset, sensory regression to S2 from highest sensory level, two segment sensory regression, total duration of motor blockade and onset of grade-3 motor blockade in patient with adjuvant Clonidine was significantly higher as compared to adjuvant Midazolam. Post operatively there was no significant difference in mean postoperative systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, saturation and respiratory rate. Sedation score was also higher in patients with adjuvant Clonidine group. Most common reported adverse events with Clonidine was hypotension and bradycardia. Conclusion: Adjuvant Clonidine 45 μg intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine (0.5%) significantly prolongs duration of motor and sensory block. It provides adequate hemodynamic stability, prolongs postoperative analgesia without any significant side effects.
Authors and Affiliations
Mahesh M Patel
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP622199
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.15
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
An Observational Study to Compare Intrathecal Midazolam and Clonidine for Post Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Hernia Surgeries
This observational study is designed to compare the intrathecal preservative free midazolam and clonidine, used as an adjuvant with hyperbaric bupivacaine for post operative analgesia in patients undergoing elective her...
A Comparative Study between Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine with Fentanyl in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia
AIM: Clinical evaluation of efficacy of adding Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl to Ropivacaine in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries . Method: This was a randomized double blind study of postoperative epidural analgesi...
Comparision of Direct vs Indirect Laryngoscopic View by C-Mac Videolaryngoscope
Introduction: Previous studies have hypothesized that in routine patients undergoing surgery, the conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope compared to direct laryngoscopy can improve the rate of glottis view significantly....
Use of Oral Clonidine for Attenuation of Pressor Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation Associated with IV Ketamine Induction
Background: Premedication is used to provide sedation and anxiolysis and to enhance the quality of induction, maintenance and recovery from anaesthesia. The present study was carried out to study the pressor responses to...
A Comparative Study of Intubating Conditions between PropofolFentanyl-Midazolam and Propofol-Fentanyl-Lignocaine Groups without Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
Introduction: Tracheal Intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs was used to assess the airway by laryngoscopy. We compared the effect of midazolam and lignocaine on intubating conditions along with prop...