A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF SAFETY AND BENFITS IN BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY.

Journal Title: IJSR-International Journal Of Scientific Research - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 8

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a prospective randomized study. Methods: Two hundred fifty patients were analyzed following either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. The main outcome measures were postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included evaluation of pain and activity scores at base line preoperatively and on every postoperative day, as well as resumption of diet and length of hospital stay. Activity scores and quality of life were assessed on short-term follow-up. Results: There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups (17.5% versus 16% in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively), but some early complications in the laparoscopic group required a reoperation. Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (60 minutes versus 40 minutes; P = 0.000) while there was no difference in the pain scores and medications, resumption of diet, length of stay, or activity scores. At 2 weeks, there was no difference in the activity or pain scores, Appendectomy for acute or complicated (perforated and gangrenous) appendicitis had similar complication rates, regardless of the technique (P = 0.181). Conclusions Unlike other minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic appendectomy did not offer a significant advantage over open appendectomy in all studied parameters except quality of life scores at 2 weeks. It also took longer to perform. The choice of the procedure should be based on surgeon or patient preference.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Suri Appa Rao Malla

Keywords

Related Articles

PATTERN OF GLOMERULAR DISEASES IN NORTH EAST INDIA: LIGHT MICROSCOPY & IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE STUDY

Introduction: The spectrum of glomerular diseases varies significantly in different parts of the world and they are the leading cause of end-stage renal disease world wide. In the light of paucity of data from north east...

A STUDY ON AWARENESS AND PRACTICES OF ASHA WORKERS IN RURAL AREAS OF ALIGARH

INTRODUCTIONe Government of India launched the National Rural Health Mission on 12th April 2005,to provide primary health care to poor and vulnerable sections of the population.ASHA is Accredited Social Health Activist...

A Study of current Knowledge and Awareness of Biomedical Waste Management among the Nursing Students of Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Karnataka, India.

Introduction: Biomedical waste (BWM) management is currently a burning issue more so with the increasing healthcare facilities and increasing waste generation. erefore knowledge regarding the segregation and disposal of...

A STUDY ON UNUSED AND EXPIRED DRUG DISPOSAL PRACTICES : KNOWLEDGE AND BEHAVIOURAL PATTERNS AMONG THE RURAL POPULATION

INTRODUCTION: Unused and expired drugs in the households constitute a dominating cause of environmental contamination with drugs and other health hazards in addition to Industrial waste of the pharmaceutical companies. T...

COMPARISON OF SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE VY CLOSURE AFTER LE FORT 1 OSTEOTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Orthognathic surgery is performed to alter the shape of the jaws to improve dental occlusion stability, temporomandibular joint function and patient's facial proportions. Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery show con...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP508332
  • DOI -
  • Views 39
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Suri Appa Rao Malla (2018). A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF SAFETY AND BENFITS IN BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY.. IJSR-International Journal Of Scientific Research, 7(8), 17-18. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-508332