A Critical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia in Comparison with General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 11

Abstract

Context: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under general anesthesia plays a major role in larger size kidney stones, but in many times spinal anesthesia will be more advantageous owing to better hemodynamic stability and also equally effective in relieving pain. Aim: The aim of this current study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Settings and Design: It is a randomized prospective study done in MelmaruvathurAdhiparasakthi Institute of Medical sciences and research from April 2016 to April 2018. Methods and Material: 100 patients who were undergoing PCNL were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Group SA (n=50) received total dose 3.4 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine with 0.6mg of Nalbuphine. Group GA (n=50) received premedication with Glycopyrolate and Fentanyl and they were anesthetised with Propofol and Succcinylcholine Anesthesia was maintained with Vecuronium and N 2O/O2/Isoflurane. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and complications like hypotension, bradycardia were recorded intraoperatively and postoperatively. Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis were calculated with the graph pad prism 5.0 software. The data were expressed as a mean and standard deviation.All the quatitative variables were analysed using Unpaired t­test. Results: Pulse rate at 5, 10, 45, 60 minutesintra operatively and at 0, 3, 5 hours postoperatively were significantly less in patients receiving spinal anesthesia group when compared to general anesthesia group (p<0.0001). Mean arterial pressure at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60 minutes intra operatively and at 0, 3, 5 hours postoperatively was found to be less in spinal anesthesia group then the GA group (p< 0.0001). The VAS score at 0, 3, 5, 8 hours was found to be less and statistically significant in spinal anesthesia group as compared to general anaesthsia group (0.66±0.51/4.14±0.75, 1.38±0.49/5.4±0.61, 1.8±0.45/4.32±0.47, 3.78±0.58/4.34±0.47). Moreover analgesic requirement of tramadol more than 100mg was lower in SA group than GA group. Conclusions: Our study shows that spinal anesthesia for PCNL is relativelysafe and equally effective alternative to general anesthesia with better hemodynamic stability, lower postoperative pain, minimal analgesic requirements, and early recovery.

Authors and Affiliations

Prasath Chandran

Keywords

Related Articles

Mechanical Complications during Insertion of Central Venous Catheter in Subclavian Vein and Internal Jugular Vein: A Comparative Study

Background: Central venous catheters (CVC) are an essential component of modern critical care. They allow delivery of medications, intravenous fluids, parenteral nutrition, hemodialysis and monitoring of hemodynamic vari...

Efficacy of Nitroglycerine and Dexamethasone with Lignocaine in Bier’s Block for Upper Limb Surgery

This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of nitroglycerine and dexamethasone as adjuncts to lignocaine in the terms of onset, duration, quality and efficacy of IVRA (Bier’s block). This study was done on randomly sel...

Study of 2-Chlorprocaine 1% with Adjuvants Fentanyl and Buprinorphine in Comparison with Plain 2-Chlorprocaine1% for Subarachnoid Blocks in Perianal Surgeries

Introduction: This study aims at comparing the anaesthesia characteristics between Buprenorphine and Fentanyl when added as an adjuvant to intrathecal 2­Chloprocaine 1% in an attempt to prolong the duration of spinal ana...

Right Ventricular Systolic Function in Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) and Its Measurement by Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion

Background & Aim: Right ventricle function significantly decreases after coronary artery bypass surgery; as one of the likely causes, such a condition is attributed to the use of cardiopulmonary pump (CPB). Because nowad...

Efficacy of Epidural Steroids Injections for Treatment of Chronic Low Backache Patients

Background: Low Back Pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability in adults. Aetiology of low back pain is usually multi factorial [1]. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of epidural steroid injection...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP549898
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51118.27
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Prasath Chandran (2018). A Critical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia in Comparison with General Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(11), 1952-1957. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-549898