A Critique of methodologism from the perspective of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 96
Abstract
Gadamer’s critique of methodologism is one of the fundamental teachings of his philosophical hermeneutics. Gadamer sees truth much beyond the ability of method to grasp it completely. He criticizes the exclusive restriction of truth in methodical processes but does not reject the need for methodical work.The present article explores the origins of methodologism in ancient Greece and modern times, and studies Gadamer’s review on the extra-methodical thoughts of Greek philosophers. Then, the following issues are articulated: Gadamer’s phenomenological critique on Cartesian subjectivism, and Kantian epistemology, and the methodologism of classical hermeneutics including the separation of subject and object and the failure of methodologism in accomplishing academic goals and the inability to get to the whole truth and its inner contradictions. Gadamer finds a wrong understanding of logic and a lack of knowledge about its limitations and the boundaries of its capabilities as one of the causes for misconceptions about method and inappropriate expectations from methodologism, including the attainment of truth. And in its critique he reaches back to the Greek roots of methodologism and distinguishes between scientific logic and philosophical logic in the dichotomy of Apollonian and Dionysian ideas among Stoic philosophers and the followers of the Old Academy. Gadamer seeks to prove that the expectation to reach truth by resorting to methodologism is naive and suffers from fundamental errors and problems. He introduces extra-methodical thought and hermeneutical rationality as an alternative to methodologism and methodic rationality and defines an attention to dialectic, practical wisdom, eloquence, and the fusion of horizons as the strategy to achieve those parts of truth that lies beyond methodologism.
Authors and Affiliations
Alireza Azad, Ahmed Vaezi, Hassan Naghizadeh
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP204720
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v48i1.34493
- Views 72
- Downloads 0
A Critical Look at Kant’s Ethics
Kant’s ethical theory is one the most important theories in philosophy of ethics, which has always attracted the attention of the commentators and critics. Although it has many positive points, there are some objections...
An Examination and Analysis of the Ḥadīth on the Correlation of Knowing Oneself and Knowledge of God from the Viewpoint of the Shī‘a Scholars
Given the importance of theology and best ways of knowing it in the Islamic culture, this article is intended to examine the method of self-knowledge according to the ḥadīth, man ‘arafa nafsa faqad ‘arafa Rabba (he who k...
The Role of God's Names and Attributes in Semantic Degrees of Divine Promises and Threats
Among the ways of stating God's actions in the Qur'an is the causal inference (ta‘līl) of any one of them by Divine names and attributes. Promise and threat as God's actions is not an exception in this regard. According...
An Analysis of the Textology of Imam al-Rizā (A.S.)’s Ziyārat Nāma Based of the Theory of Speech Function
The theory of speech function is one of the most significant theories affecting on the two fields of the philosophy of language and the language of religion. Austin, the developer of this theory, named the application of...
A Comparative Study of Divine Will in the Philosophy of Spinoza and Ustād Muṭahharī
This writing addresses Divine Will from the viewpoints of the two great philosophers, Ustād Muṭahharī and Spinoza. It aims at clarifying the similarities and discrepancies existing in their viewpoints concerning the ques...