A Critique of the Theory “Reconciliation between Muftaraqāt and Differentiation between Mujtama‘āt”
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2013, Vol 45, Issue 94
Abstract
In Sunnī and Imāmī jurisprudence, some have said that the legal base in devising rulings is founded on “differentiation between similarities (mutimāthilāt)” and “reconciliation between differences (mutafarriqāt)” and in other words, the legal basis is on the notion of considering the ruling of the similar subjects as different and the ruling of the different subjects as similar. Most of those maintaining the existence of this basis in legal law have stated it as a reason for the invalidity of analogy (qiyās); and some have resorted to it for solving the problems of the rulings that are apparently inconsistent with intellect. The only reason of those maintaining this view is the examples in which the ruling for the similar subjects is apparently considered as different and the ruling of the different subjects as similar. Some jurists have rejected the existence of such basis in legal law and have mentioned some responses to the claims of its proponents, most of which indicate the legal laws as having a cause (mu‘allal) and that it is not possible to consider the ruling of the similar subjects as different. In this writing, we examine the origin of this rule and the arguments of its believers and deniers. What is obtained as a conclusion from the examination of this claim and its responses is that whether the basis is on judicial doctrine, which regards the rulings as centered around the interests (masāliḥ) and abuses (mafāsid), or based on the Ash‘rite doctrine that does not regard the rulings subject to specific reasons, such a proposition is not resolute.
Authors and Affiliations
ḤUsayn ṢāBirī, MūSā Zarqī
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP184021
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.11844
- Views 133
- Downloads 0
Interaction of Value and Reality in Creating Legal Rule
Fundamentals of legal rule is one of the major discourses of the philosophy of law, which has led to the formation of numerous intellectual schools in this field. The main query of the present research is that whether th...
A New Look at Mawlawī (Legislative) and Irshādī (Advisory) and their Methodological Resultant
After determining the status of mawlawī and irshādī and deciding that they are attributes of commands and prohibitions and not attributes of ruling and after giving the opted definition and its advantage over other defin...
Analysis of the Legal Decree of Allowance and Determination
If, in special circumstances, a decree that had already not been permissible becomes permissible due to facilitation for the religiously accountable (mukallif), that legal decree is called allowance (rukhṣat), such as th...
Examination of the Concept of Ta‘līl (Causal Inference)
What is meant by ta‘līl is that if in a reason the cause of the judgment has been mentioned, the denial of the judgment can been concluded from the lack of that judgment; in such a way that from the denial of restriction...
Party and Partisanship in Islamic Thought
Party and partisanship, in modern meaning, are new phenomena and, from the jurisprudence point of view, newly-emerged issues in Shī‘a community and culture. In religious thought, there are ambiguities, uncertainties and...