A Critique on the Legal Theory of the Sufficiency of Swearing Fifty Oaths by the Claimant in Qasāma (Compurgation) (The Legal Principles of Article 377 of the Penal Code Bill of 1390 sh/2011)
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 100
Abstract
Qasāma is one of the proofs for homicide, which will be reliable in case of the existence of lawth (strong suspicion). There are two major views on how it is implemented. In sum, the first view deems as necessary swearing fifty oaths by fifty people; however the second view deems as sufficient swearing of fifty oaths by the claimant for proving the crime. The second view is a generally accepted fatwā and the first one is a rare fatwā theme. According to article 248 of the Islamic penal code passed in 1370 sh/1991, the generally accepted view dominated; however, in 1380-81 sh/2001-2002 upon the amelioration of the Islamic penal code, this rule was annulled by the fatwa of the Supreme Leader, and for proving homicide, the legislator deemed as necessary the swearing oaths by fifty people without repeating the oath. In the penal code passed in 1390 sh/2011, this same basis dominates. It is attempted in this article to examine the legal and judicial basis of article 377 of the ameliorated law. The writer believes that, with respect to some proofs existing in the evidences, even if the second view has strong foundations, qasāma is not a merely devotional institution; rather, the legislator has intended it in terms of intermediation and, if necessary, he can change its quality.
Authors and Affiliations
Husayn Haqiqatpour, Muhammad Taqi Fakhla’I, Ehsan Aliakbari Baboukani Baboukani
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190091
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i20.15947
- Views 102
- Downloads 0
Evidence of Intellect and its Status in the Legal Attitude (Sīra) of Muḥaqqiq Ardabīlī
Given the importance of the evidence of intellect (dalīl-i ‘aql) in inferring legal rulings, especially in new issues, examining the evidence of intellect would help a better use of the evidence of intellect. Examining t...
Dhimma and ‘Uhda in Shī‘a Jurisprudence
The concept of dhimma and ‘uhda (obligation and undertaking) comprises one of the very important subdivisions of commitments in Shī‘a jurisprudence. The application of these two terms is very common in legal texts, both...
The Theory of the Permissibility and Soundness of Buying and Selling Human Organs in Imāmī Jurisprudence
Buying and selling human organs is among the newly-arisen jurisprudential issues, about which the Imāmī jurists have opted two theories in response to this issue. Some of them have regarded the situational decree of buyi...
The Principle of “Obligation for Dignifying Human Being” in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law
The inherent dignity is a Divine bounty from God to Man and since it is inherent and intrinsic in human nature, its dispossession is not possible. According to some of the noble verses of the Qur’ān, human dignity can be...
The Role of the Wasting and Causation Rules in Environmental Civil Responsibility
Pollution and destruction of environment and the resulting damages is one of the basic perplexities of modern industrial and urban societies and one of the most essential issues dealt with in environment rights. Thus, gi...