A Deliberation on Jurisprudential Evidences of Article 468 of Islamic Penal Law, Passed in 1392 sh/2013

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 46, Issue 99

Abstract

By accepting the responsibility of ‘āqila (blood relatives of the person perpetrated homicide) in unintentional homicides, the Islamic Penal Law, passed on Ordibehesht 1, 1392 sh/March 21, 2013, has included this view in article 463. This law maintains the following concerning how to pay for the diya (blood money) mentioned under article 468, “‘Āqila includes father, son, and the paternal and maternal blood relatives or paternal in order of inheritance level.” The content of the latter article relies on the consent of the renowned majority of the Imāmī jurists. They believe, “With the existence of the nearest of kin, undertaking of the farthest of kin is inapplicable and in case of the presence of all the male blood relatives, payment of the blood money is obligatory upon the nearest of kin according to the level of inheritance.” Their main evidence is their relying on the āya, ﴾but the blood relatives are more entitled to inherit from one another in the Book of Allah﴿ as well as the traditions concerning the above-mentioned issue. The writer does not regard as complete the reliance on the above āya and as fully approved the reliance on traditions. After criticizing the evidences of the generally accepted view, he concludes the following, “In payment of the blood money for unintentional homicide, the observance of order among the āqilia is not necessary and all of them are responsible for payment of the blood money; even though they are not heritable at death.” Although contrary to the generally accepted view, this view has drawn the agreement of some of the jurists; moreover, the generalities of the evidences approve it as well.”

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Muhammadian, Muhammad Mohseni Dehkalani, Muhammad Taqi Qabooli Durafshan

Keywords

Related Articles

The Core Concept of Astarābādī’s Intellectual System and its Reflection in Biography (Tarājum) Sources

In analyzing the scholarly achievements, Muslim writers make extensive use of biography books. The information of people’s life and their geographical conditions, which are included in their specific intellectual inclina...

Legal-Judicial Study of the Verdict on Multiple Crimes resulting from a Single Strike

In case multiple crimes are caused by a single strike, there are three different beliefs concerning the ruling on this issue. The renowned majority of jurists have deemed as necessary the payment of blood money (diya) by...

Indirect Proxy

If the agent, who has the right to appoint a proxy, exercises his right and appoints another person for pursuing the subject of agency, the appointed person is not the agent of the appointer; rather, he is regarded as th...

Proportion of Ordinance and Subject: Functions and Mechanism of Recognition in the Jurists’ Expression

One of the requisites for proper understanding of the legal statutes (nuṣūṣ) is that the legislator and the jurist, along with other wise people in various scenes of life, should enjoy collective wisdom and, besides havi...

The Role of the Wasting and Causation Rules in Environmental Civil Responsibility

Pollution and destruction of environment and the resulting damages is one of the basic perplexities of modern industrial and urban societies and one of the most essential issues dealt with in environment rights. Thus, gi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP184662
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v46i19.29184
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ali Muhammadian, Muhammad Mohseni Dehkalani, Muhammad Taqi Qabooli Durafshan (2015). A Deliberation on Jurisprudential Evidences of Article 468 of Islamic Penal Law, Passed in 1392 sh/2013. فقه و اصول, 46(99), 141-158. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-184662