A Discrepancy Between “What Should You Choose?” and “What Do You Choose?” in Intertemporal and Risky Decision-Making

Abstract

Purpose: When facing important decisions, people often ask themselves “What should I choose?” This question may involve intertemporal and risky decisions. The aim of our study was to test a potential discrepancy between the normative and descriptive perspective, that is, between “What should you choose?” and “What do you choose?”.<br/><br/>Methodology: In this study we assessed the rate of delay and probability discounting of 236 participants. The design was a 2 (“choose”/“should choose”) × 2 (small/large) × 5 (delays or probabilities) factorial design in delay and probability discounting.<br/><br/>Findings: People are less impulsive when taking the normative perspective than when they take the descriptive one. This phenomenon occurs in relation to large payoffs. However taking the normative rather than descriptive perspective makes no difference in risky decisions.<br/><br/>Research limitations: In further research it would be beneficial to study real outcomes as choice consequences and to control for variables that might moderate the impact of our manipulation, such as addictions.<br/><br/>Implications: The manipulation with the perspective may be applied not only in financial decision making. Our results may find a practical implementation to help impulsive people make more sensible decisions.<br/><br/>Originality: We demonstrated the internal conflict between the descriptive and normative mode in delay discounting decision making.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Białaszek, Franciszek Ostaszewski, Piotr Zielonka

Keywords

Related Articles

W obronie rutyny w zarządzaniu. O zachowaniach rutynowych, rytualnych i performatywnych w sytuacjach niepewności

Jak pokazują badania zarówno kultur pozaeuropejskich, jak i organizacji funkcjonującychw krajach rozwiniętych, zapotrzebowanie na rutynę jest tym większe,im wyższy jest poziom niepewności w działaniach członków danej spo...

Czynniki sprzyjające i utrudniające współpracę pomiędzy organizacjami

Współcześnie konkurują ze sobą już nie tylko pojedyncze przedsiębiorstwa na poziomie,lecz także ugrupowania gospodarcze. Obserwowana jest jednocześnie rywalizacjapomiędzy regionami, co wynika z konieczności kształtowania...

Interfrm Cooperation Strategy of Hyper-Growth and Stable-Growth ICT Firms in Sweden

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to compare the phenomenon of interfrm cooperation strategy in both hyper-growth, and stable-growth knowledge and technology–intensive frms, in a country characterized by a high...

The Relationship between Service Quality Dimensions and Brand Equity: Higher Education Students’ Perceptions

Purpose: Since the higher education environment has become highly competitive, the application of marketing principles to the education environment becomes increasingly evident. In order to attract new students and conti...

Innovative Models of Supply Chain Management

Purpose: The paper scientifically analyzes sustainable development in the context of economic entities and their integration in supply chains that reflect the various business models between parties involved in value cre...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP518283
  • DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.239
  • Views 186
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Białaszek, Franciszek Ostaszewski, Piotr Zielonka (2018). A Discrepancy Between “What Should You Choose?” and “What Do You Choose?” in Intertemporal and Risky Decision-Making. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 26(4), 2-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-518283