A Discrepancy Between “What Should You Choose?” and “What Do You Choose?” in Intertemporal and Risky Decision-Making

Abstract

Purpose: When facing important decisions, people often ask themselves “What should I choose?” This question may involve intertemporal and risky decisions. The aim of our study was to test a potential discrepancy between the normative and descriptive perspective, that is, between “What should you choose?” and “What do you choose?”.<br/><br/>Methodology: In this study we assessed the rate of delay and probability discounting of 236 participants. The design was a 2 (“choose”/“should choose”) × 2 (small/large) × 5 (delays or probabilities) factorial design in delay and probability discounting.<br/><br/>Findings: People are less impulsive when taking the normative perspective than when they take the descriptive one. This phenomenon occurs in relation to large payoffs. However taking the normative rather than descriptive perspective makes no difference in risky decisions.<br/><br/>Research limitations: In further research it would be beneficial to study real outcomes as choice consequences and to control for variables that might moderate the impact of our manipulation, such as addictions.<br/><br/>Implications: The manipulation with the perspective may be applied not only in financial decision making. Our results may find a practical implementation to help impulsive people make more sensible decisions.<br/><br/>Originality: We demonstrated the internal conflict between the descriptive and normative mode in delay discounting decision making.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Białaszek, Franciszek Ostaszewski, Piotr Zielonka

Keywords

Related Articles

Indicators as an Instrument of Measurement in Management Accounting in Logistics Enterprises in Poland

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present the extent to which indicators applied by logistics providers in Poland measure logistics-related processes and performance in the context of implementing the concept of...

Internet-Mediated Dialog with Consumers: A Cross-Industry Multiple-Case Study of Polish Exporters

Purpose: The paper explores the online dialog of firms and consumers through corporate websites and social networks. The objective is to investigate the state of this dialog, its mechanisms, and outcomes in four export-o...

Analytical, Practical and Emotional Intelligence and Line Manager Competencies

Purpose: The research objective was to examine to what extent line manager competencies are linked to intelligence, and more specifically, three types of intelligence: analytical (fluid), practical and emotional.Methodol...

Wyższe szkolnictwo ekonomiczne w Polsce wobec wyzwań kryzysu

W artykule wskazano główne właściwości obecnego globalnego kryzysu finansowego. Niektóre z nich występowały w wielu poprzednich załamaniach gospodarczych, niektóre jednak nie ujawniały się lub nie występowały z taką inte...

Management education in an economic crisis vs. good practices in accounting

The capital market provides new challenges for accounting associated with financial reporting information and value based management, which are determined using IAS/ 1FRS. Simultaneously, entities have to adapt the finan...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP518283
  • DOI 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.239
  • Views 155
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Białaszek, Franciszek Ostaszewski, Piotr Zielonka (2018). A Discrepancy Between “What Should You Choose?” and “What Do You Choose?” in Intertemporal and Risky Decision-Making. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 26(4), 2-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-518283