A PLEADING IN FAVOUR OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2016, Vol 6, Issue 0

Abstract

Most of the European countries have chosen the centralized system of constitutional review, performed by a unique authority empowered with the competence of removing from the normative ensemble those legal provisions that do not comply with the principles and rules comprised in the Basic Law. This „European model” has proved to be more appropriate than the so-called „American model” in what concerns the compatibility with the European jurisdictional mechanism. Romania has adopted the same European trend and the Constitutional Court has become a very important actor in the Romanian legal landscape. From the very beginning of its activity, it has influenced in a great measure the national normative system. It has been sometimes criticized and accused that it interferes in an excessive way in the legislative process. Due to its competence to regulate the juridical conflicts between the public authorities and its possibility to repeal laws before their promulgation, it has been many times in the centre of heavy attacks, mostly from different political forces, often driven through mass media. Nevertheless, despite of its detractors, the Constitutional Court has proven, over the years, its ability to develop the Romanian normative system. The present paper intends to display the most significant contribution of the Romanian Constitutional Court in improving various legal regulations. In the same time and much more important, using concrete examples from the Court’s case-law, the paper also intends to demonstrate that the Constitutional Court of Romania has been a major factor of improving peoples’ life, removing unconstitutional obstacles set in front of the unimpeded exercise of their fundamental rights and freedoms.

Authors and Affiliations

Valentina BĂRBĂŢEANU

Keywords

Related Articles

THE CONCEPT OF PATRIMONY AND COMMON ASPECTS OF OFFENCES AGAINST PATRIMONY REGULATED BY THE CRIMINAL LAW

This study aims to analyze in detail the concept of patrimony and then, will identify the common aspects of all offences against patrimony regulated by the actually Criminal Law. We presented elements of meaning of “patr...

THE SOLUTIONS OF EURO ZONE CRISIS – A NEO-GRAMSCIAN CRITIQUE

This paper belongs to the area of critical studies of European Integration and tries to analyse the nature of the European states’ response to euro zone crisis, during the negotiation of European Fiscal Pact. The theoret...

GROWTH OF COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE BY LINKING KNOWLEDGE WORKERS THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA

Collective intelligence can be defined, very broadly, as groups of individuals that do things collectively, and that seem to be intelligent. Collective intelligence has existed for ages. Families, tribes, companies, coun...

HISTORICAL COST AND FAIR VALUE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF FINANCIAL CRISIS

Financial crisis determined the fast extension of global financial bankruptcy upon the world, representing at the same time the first crisis of the accounting term of "fair value", under the shade of which subsists a num...

SOCIAL EQUITY SYSTEM

The aim of this paper is to present a application of social equity system, as normative principle, in democratic development of society. Political phenomenology of law reveals that normativism does not simply reflect the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP90782
  • DOI -
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Valentina BĂRBĂŢEANU (2016). A PLEADING IN FAVOUR OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 6(0), 344-356. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-90782