A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 33

Abstract

BACKGROUND Appendicular pathology presenting as acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of persisting progressive lower abdominal pain in all age groups of patients. For more than a century, the traditional open method of appendicectomy has been both safe and effective. However, recent literature suggests that patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy have a faster postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to compare the open and laparoscopic methods of appendicectomy in general surgical practice in terms of operating time and certain postoperative parameters including pain, cosmesis, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a non-randomised controlled trial study. The total population group included 73 patients (Age group between 18 - 60 yrs.). 36 patients had laparoscopic appendicectomy (Group-A) and 37 patients had open appendicectomy (Group-B). This study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery at Calcutta National Medical College. The study was done over a period of one year from 01.01.2016 to 01.01.2017. The data derived from our study was statistically analysed using X2 Chi-square test and MannWhitney U test. P < 0.05 was taken as the level of significance. RESULTS Patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy had a shorter hospital stay (3 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.1). The operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was longer (60 mins vs 30 mins, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative morbidity following both procedures were comparable. CONCLUSION Both laparoscopic and open methods of appendicectomy are feasible, safe and effective for treating appendicitis. In our study postoperative pain, wound infection and duration of hospital stay were less after laparoscopic surgery. However, the operating time for the laparoscopic method was longer. Therefore, in our study laparoscopic appendicectomy was found to enjoy an overall advantage in terms of postoperative recovery.

Authors and Affiliations

Joy Roy, Arunima Mukhopadhyay

Keywords

Related Articles

PARKINSON’S DISEASE- A REVIEW

Parkinson’s disease is a disease of insidious onset. The symptoms usually come on slowly over time. (1). Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease that affects an area of the brain- Substantia nigra. This is age...

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF METFORMIN AND VILDAGLIPTIN FOR MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem which increases the rate of morbidity and mortality. Cheap Metformin and costlier vildagliptin are the frequently used oral hypoglycaemic agents. The comparative eff...

AFB POSITIVITY IN TUBERCULAR LYMPHADENITIS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH CYTOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SAHARANPUR

BACKGROUND Tuberculosis is one of the most common causes of lymphadenopathy in India. It is possible to diagnose it with the help of a minimally invasive procedure known as Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and ther...

SEPTICAEMIC MELIOIDOSIS IN A DIABETIC PATIENT FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN KERALA

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 62-year-old male presented to the Medicine Department with altered sensorium with a history of fever of unknown origin of 6 weeks duration. Initially, it was low-grade, on and off fever, which late...

CORE-PERIPHERAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT AND BLOOD LACTATE LEVEL AS MARKERS OF PROGNOSIS IN CHILDREN WITH DENGUE

BACKGROUND Severe Dengue is an important cause of childhood morbidity in many tropical regions. Dengue virus (DENV) infection leads to a range of outcomes including subclinical infection, undifferentiated febrile illness...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP541624
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/821
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joy Roy, Arunima Mukhopadhyay (2018). A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(33), 3657-3660. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-541624