A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 33

Abstract

BACKGROUND Appendicular pathology presenting as acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of persisting progressive lower abdominal pain in all age groups of patients. For more than a century, the traditional open method of appendicectomy has been both safe and effective. However, recent literature suggests that patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy have a faster postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to compare the open and laparoscopic methods of appendicectomy in general surgical practice in terms of operating time and certain postoperative parameters including pain, cosmesis, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a non-randomised controlled trial study. The total population group included 73 patients (Age group between 18 - 60 yrs.). 36 patients had laparoscopic appendicectomy (Group-A) and 37 patients had open appendicectomy (Group-B). This study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery at Calcutta National Medical College. The study was done over a period of one year from 01.01.2016 to 01.01.2017. The data derived from our study was statistically analysed using X2 Chi-square test and MannWhitney U test. P < 0.05 was taken as the level of significance. RESULTS Patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy had a shorter hospital stay (3 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.1). The operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was longer (60 mins vs 30 mins, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative morbidity following both procedures were comparable. CONCLUSION Both laparoscopic and open methods of appendicectomy are feasible, safe and effective for treating appendicitis. In our study postoperative pain, wound infection and duration of hospital stay were less after laparoscopic surgery. However, the operating time for the laparoscopic method was longer. Therefore, in our study laparoscopic appendicectomy was found to enjoy an overall advantage in terms of postoperative recovery.

Authors and Affiliations

Joy Roy, Arunima Mukhopadhyay

Keywords

Related Articles

&nbsp; CORRECTION OF ANAEMIA WITH ERYTHROPOIETIN IN CKD/ESRD PATIENTS

&nbsp; Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by gradual and permanent loss of kidney function. One of the most common complications of CKD is Anaemia.1,3 Anaemia often appears earlier in course of CKD and worse...

TO STUDY THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HRCT OVER CHEST X- RAY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASES

BACKGROUND Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, characterized by restrictive physiology, impaired gas exchange, pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Chest radiogr...

&nbsp; SPECTRUM OF MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMOURS IN CHILDREN IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA

&nbsp; [b]BACKGROUND[/b]: Musculoskeletal tumours in children are a source of concern for the orthopaedic surgeon and paediatric oncologist. In Nigeria and other parts of sub Saharan Africa, where infectious diseases...

A STUDY OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BIRTH SEASONALITY, BIRTH ORDER AND SPACING IN SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is a major psychiatric illness characterised mainly by abnormal thinking as well as changes in mood and perception. Western studies tell that Schizophrenics are born in monsoon contrary to Indian...

AWARENESS OF HAND WASHING AMONG HOUSE-SURGEONS OF GOVERNMENT GENERAL HOSPITAL, VIJAYAWADA

[b]BACKGROUND: [/b]The disease burden contributed by health care associated infections (HCAI) is not negligible. The occurrence of HCAI can be substantially reduced by a simple procedure like hand washing. [b]OBJECTI...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP541624
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/821
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joy Roy, Arunima Mukhopadhyay (2018). A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(33), 3657-3660. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-541624