A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Epidural Block and General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Analgesia

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 3

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure for removal of calculi in pelvicalyceal system which is usually performed under general anaesthesia. We conducted a prospective, randomized, comparative study to compare epidural block and general anesthesia with respect to hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PCNL. Methods: 80 urological patients of ASA I and II grade,posted for percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included in our study. They were divided into two groups of 40 each. In patients belonging to Group G, surgery was performed under General Anaesthesia and in Group E, surgery was performed under Epidural Anaesthesia using 1.5mg/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 1mcg/kg of Fentanyl to a maximum of 50mcg. Intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative analgesia, amount of rescue analgesic required and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Complications, if any were also compared. Results: In our study, we found that the Heart rate, Mean arterial pressure were increased in the initial 5 minutes after giving General Anaesthesia in patients belonging to Group G when compared to Group E. Time duration of post-operative analgesia was more in Group E with less amount of analgesic requirement than in patients belonging to Group G. Post-operative complications were also less in Group E than in Group G. With the results obtained in our study, we concluded that Epidural anaesthesia is better than General anaesthesia in patients undergoing PCNL.

Authors and Affiliations

Sowmya M. Jois

Keywords

Related Articles

Efficacy of Adding Midazolam to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Technique of Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries

Background: Brachial plexus blocks provide a wonderful alternative to general anaesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Various adjuvants like opioids, midazolam and 2 agonists have been used to improve the quality of block...

Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Ropivacaine has been chosen for supraclavicular brachial plexus blockfor its safety profile. Magnesium Sulphate is used as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics as it is known to potentiate sensory and motor bloc...

Comparing the Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block and Intraperitoneal Installation using Ropivacaine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common ambulatory elective procedures. Surgical pain derives significantly from the incisions made in the anterior abdominal wall. Nerve supplying the anterior...

Comparative Study between Esmolol and Xylocard for Attenuation of Pressor Responses during Laryngoscopy and Intubation

Background: Cardiovascular complications are one of the most common causes of anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality.The present work was undertaken to compare the effect of lignocaine (Xylocard) with esmolol on blun...

A Study on Combined Spinal Epidural Labour Analgesia a Comparison between 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl

Introduction: The responsibility of the Anaesthesiologist in obstetrics is arguably greater than in any other fields of anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the quality of epidural analgesia of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.1% ropiv...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP533385
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5318.11
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sowmya M. Jois (2018). A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Epidural Block and General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Analgesia. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(3), 419-424. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-533385