A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study between Amlodipine and Diltiazem in Non-diabetic Patients of Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Abstract

Introduction: In developed countries hypertension is held responsible a fourth contributor to premature death, while it ranks seventh in developing countries. It is important to know this fact because even a 2 mmHg decrease can prevent 151,000 stroke and 153,000 coronary heart disease deaths in our country.Ca2+ channel blockers are effective and preferred drugs in lowering blood pressure and decreasing cardiovascular events in the elderly with isolated systolic hypertension. It is therefore imperative that we should have maximum data on their pattern of utilization and the adverse drug reactions.Aims and Objective: To observe and compare the anti-hypertensive efficacy as well as incidence of adverse drug reactions between amlodipine anddiltiazem.Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, open-label study included 80 patients suffering from stage I / II essential hypertension. These patients included males and females randomized in each study group. Observation and Result: In the present study, we observed that amlodipine anddiltiazem are effective agents in reducing both systolic and diastolic BP throughout the study period when measured at the 15thday, 30thday, 45thday and 90th day. A total of 39% of the patients reported some sort of adverse-effects like peripheral oedema (12.5%), nausea(5%), dizziness (5%), headache (7.5%) and , abdominal pain (2.5%) in the group1 and 24% in the diltiazem treated group 2, with noted adverse-effects like peripheral oedema (5%), nausea (5%), dizziness (5%), headache (5%) and abdominal pain (0%). Conclusion: The antihypertensive effect of these two drugs included in the study was statistically significant. These two drugs were equally effective in reducing the systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The incidence of peripheral oedema, abdominal pain and headache were more in amlodipine treated group than diltiazem treated group. However, this difference in the frequency of adverse-effects between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Adverse effects were tolerated by both the study groups and hence can be used as efficient antihypertensive drugs in management of essential hypertension.

Authors and Affiliations

Santosh C. Gursale , Sudheer Kumar , Narayan P. Burte , Mohankrishna Ghanta

Keywords

Related Articles

A retrospective study of prescription pattern and cost analysis of selected drugs used in coronary artery disease and angioplasty patients

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a condition wherever the vascular supply to the heart is obstructed by fatty tissue, occlusion or spasm of coronary arteries. There is increasing importance of prescription pattern monito...

Biochemical studies of various risk factors and important minerals in pre-eclamptic patients

Background: The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are major causes of morbidity and mortality. They may lead to eclamptic conditions causing seizures, comatose conditions and death in hypertensive mothers. It will also...

A clinical profile and factors associated with age related macular degeneration

Introduction: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness among people aged 55 years and older in the U.S and other Western countries. Aims and Objectives: To study Clinical profile and facto...

Neural tube defects – hospital based study in Hassan

Objective: Neural Tube Defects include anencephaly, spina bifida, hydrocephalus are the congential malformation with multiple etiology. This study will be helpful in planning strategies for prevention of neural tube defe...

Coping the Psychosomatic Indicators of stress among wives of alcoholic addicted husbands in sub-urban parts of Chennai

Background: Alcoholic addiction is a major social pathology. Because of increasing evidence of social drinking and change in cultural pattern, alcoholic addiction is widely prevalent among men in the rural areas. Also th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP152331
  • DOI -
  • Views 83
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Santosh C. Gursale, Sudheer Kumar, Narayan P. Burte, Mohankrishna Ghanta (2014). A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study between Amlodipine and Diltiazem in Non-diabetic Patients of Mild to Moderate Hypertension. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 10(2), 196-201. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-152331